MedPath

A Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid (HA) Fillers

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Volume Deficiency of the Midface
Interventions
Device: Restylane Volyme
Device: Restylane Defyne
Device: Restylane Lyft Lidocaine
Registration Number
NCT03869450
Lead Sponsor
Galderma R&D
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to investigate the degree of improvement in appearance after treatment with different hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers. Product selection is based on Investigator assessment of participant tissue coverage and main treatment goal (volumizing, lifting or contouring).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • Male/Female 25 to 55 years old that needs lifting, contouring or volumization of the midface
  • Signed and dated informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Known/previous allergy or hypersensitivity to any injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) gel and lidocain
  • Previous use of any permanent or semi-permanent facial tissue augmentation therapy or contouring with, lifting threads, permanent implants, or autologous fat in the treatment area
  • Previous use of any HA or collagen based facial tissue augmentation therapy in the facial area, any previous use of neurotoxin or any previous facial surgery
  • Any medical condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would make the participant unsuitable for inclusion

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Restylane VolymeRestylane VolymeAccording to the treatment algorithm, treated with Restylane Volyme
Restylane DefyneRestylane DefyneAccording to the treatment algorithm, treated with Restylane Defyne
Restylane Lyft LidocaineRestylane Lyft LidocaineAccording to the treatment algorithm, treated with Restylane Lyft Lidocaine
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants With Aesthetic Improvement of Midface8 weeks

A blinded evaluator assesses the improvement compared to baseline (pre-treatment) using a 5-graded scale; Worse, No change, Improved, Much improved or Very much improved. Aesthetic improvement of midface is defined as those participants assessed as Improved, Much improved or Very much improved.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants With Improved Midface Volume8 weeks

A blinded evaluator assessed the fullness of the midface by using a 4-graded scale where 1= fairly full and 4= substantial loss of fullness.

Improved midface volume was defined as at least a 1-grade decrease from baseline.

Percentage of Participants Assessed as Having Natural Treatment Results8 weeks

Blinded evaluator assessed participants by answering Strongly agree/Agree/Neither agree nor disagree/Disagree/Strongly disagree to the question "Are the subject's treatment results natural looking?". Having natural treatment results is defined as being assessed with answers Strongly agree or Agree.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Galderma Research Site

🇬🇧

Edinburgh, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath