MedPath

Short-term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in Serious Physical Illness

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Malignant Neoplasm
Carcinoma
Palliative Care
Registration Number
NCT05520281
Lead Sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Brief Summary

Life-threatening physical illness may powerfully re-activate existential conflict. There is little evidence to date on the effectiveness of relationship-focused therapies in this patient group.The aim of this study is to pilot a psychodynamic treatment for patients with advanced cancer and high psychological distress.

Detailed Description

Severely physically ill patients may experience existential distress symptoms including helplessness, hopelessness, death anxiety, perceived burdensomeness and a sense of pointlessness. The latter can significantly interfere with end-of-life care processes and outcomes (receipt of treatment according to preferences, expression of desire for hastened death). So far, empirically tested psychotherapeutic programs in advanced life-threatening illness have predominantly been ultra-short and applied supportive and resource-oriented techniques. Psychodynamic treatment allows to address clinically significant existential distress through its conceptualization from early relational life experiences.

The aim of this study is to pilot a psychodynamic treatment for patients with advanced cancer and high psychological distress.The inverstigators will

1. analyse the feasibility of the treatment, and

2. investigate changes in process- and patient-relevant outcomes over the course of the treatment

The inverstigators will conduct a single-group pre-post study with five assessment points in which 50 adult patients diagnosed with advanced cancer will receive a manualized psychodynamic short-term therapy. Target parameters are assessed by diagnostic interviews, focus interviews, self-assessment questionnaires as well as electronic patient records. For research objective b) the investigators will compare the intervention group with a matched comparison group of a longitudinal cohort sample (NCT04600206). Matching will be based on stress level, demographic, and medical parameters across the 5 assessment points.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • 18 years and older
  • UICC stage IV solid tumor
  • Informed consent
  • Current physical condition that allows for at least 12 therapy sessions
  • Indication: Presence of a mental disorder with existential stress and limitations in coping capacity
Exclusion Criteria
  • Acute suicidality
  • Psychotic disorder (ICD-10: F2 diagnosis)
  • Substance dependence or abuse (ICD-10: F1 diagnosis)
  • Structural deficits that interfere with attending to regular appointments
  • Other psychotherapeutic treatment
  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • Severe physical impairment
  • Insufficient German to give informed consent and complete self-report questionnaires

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Treatment feasibilitythrough study completion, an average of 6 months

Will be assessed via semi-structured qualitative interviews.

Treatment adherencethrough study completion, an average of 6 months

Will be assessed via qualitative analysis of therapeutic session protocols and audio recordings.

Therapeutic competencethrough study completion, an average of 6 months

Will be assessed via qualitative analysis of supervision protocols.

Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability)up to 12-months follow-up

Will be assessed via Inventory for the Balanced Assessment of Negative Effects of Psychotherapy (INEP, Ladwig, Rief \& Nestoriuc, 2014).

Acceptancethrough study completion, an average of 6 months

Will be assessed via drop-out rates (number of patients not completing at least 12 sessions) and treatment compliance (number of sessions missed).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Therapeutic processthrough study completion, an average of 6 months

Will be assessed via semi-structured qualitative interviews.

Therapeutic alliance I3-, 6- 9- and 12-months follow-up

Will be assessed via California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales (CALPAS, Marmar \& Gaston, 1989) for patients and therapists.

Interpersonal problemsBaseline, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months follow up

Will be assessed via inventory for assessment of interpersonal problems (IIP-D-32, Thomas, Brähler \& Strauß, 2011).

Therapeutic alliance II3-, 6- 9- and 12-months follow-up

Will be assessed via Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ, Luborsky et al., 1996) (IIP-D-32, Thomas, Brähler \& Strauß, 2011) for patients and therapists.

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

Clinical Institute for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Düsseldorf

🇩🇪

Düsseldorf, Germany

University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Department of Medical Psychology

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

Institute of Social Work, University of Kassel

🇩🇪

Kassel, Germany

Psychosomatics, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, Medicine II, University of Würzburg

🇩🇪

Würzburg, Germany

Clinical Institute for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Düsseldorf
🇩🇪Düsseldorf, Germany

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.