Psilocybin-assisted Group Therapy for Demoralization in Long-term AIDS Survivors
- Conditions
- DistressDepressionGrief
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Modified brief Supportive Expressive Group Therapy
- Registration Number
- NCT02950467
- Lead Sponsor
- Joshua Woolley
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether psilocybin-assisted group psychotherapy is a safe and feasible treatment for demoralization in long-term AIDS survivors (LTAS).
- Detailed Description
This study is an open-label mixed-methods pilot study of an individual oral psilocybin drug session combined with ten sessions of an evidence-based, manualized brief group psychotherapy for existential distress in palliative care patients.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Not provided
- A physical, neurological or cognitive condition that makes participating in the study unsafe or unfeasible.
- Regular psychotropic medication use.
- Personal or family history of serious mental illness.
- Severe depression requiring immediate standard-of-care treatment.
- Exclusion by the clinical judgment of the study investigators.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group therapy plus psilocybin Modified brief Supportive Expressive Group Therapy Modified brief Supportive-Expressive Group Therapy will be administered as ten twice-weekly sessions. Oral psilocybin will be administered once in a clinical setting. Group therapy plus psilocybin Psilocybin Modified brief Supportive-Expressive Group Therapy will be administered as ten twice-weekly sessions. Oral psilocybin will be administered once in a clinical setting.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by NIH Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 2.0 Enrollment to 3-month follow up, about 5 months Full details of adverse event data are in the Adverse Events module of this ClinicalTrials.gov entry.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit by patient interview. During medication visits, adverse events were also assess by vitals sign monitoring, patient self-report, and adverse events observed by clinicians.Subject Recruitment and Retention Duration of study, about 24 months Two therapy groups of at least 4 subjects each will complete the study
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline in Demoralization Scale-II at End-of-treatment Baseline and end-of-treatment (7 weeks duration) Demoralization self-report measure. Minimum = 0. Maximum = 32. Higher scores means a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline in Demoralization Scale-II at 3-month Follow-up Baseline and 3-month follow-up Demoralization self-report measure. Minimum = 0. Maximum = 32. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline in Inventory of Complicated Grief-Revised at End-of-treatment Baseline and end-of-treatment (7 weeks duration) Complicated Grief self-report measure. Minimum = 0, Maximum = 76. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Change From Baseline in Inventory of Complicated Grief at 3-month Follow-up Baseline and 3-month follow-up Complicated Grief self-report measure. Minimum = 0, Maximum = 76. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Change From Baseline in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-Revised at End-of-treatment Baseline and end-of-treatment (7 weeks duration) Depression self-report measure. Minimum = 0. Maximum = 60. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-Revised at 3-month Follow-up Baseline and 3-month follow-up Depression self-report measure. Minimum = 0. Maximum = 60. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Change in Average Score on Subscales of Group Questionnaire Pre-drug vs Post-drug Mean scores averaged over 2 weeks pre-medication compared to 3 weeks post-medication. The Group Questionnaire is a self-report measure with three sub-scales that measure Positive Bonding, Positive Working and Negative Relationship dimensions of the relationships at 3 levels: between group members, between group members and group therapists, and between group members and the group as a whole. Each subscale score is calculated by summation of the ratings across all three levels for each subscale. Positive Bonding scores range from 13 to 91 with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Positive Working scores range 8 to 56 with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Negative Relationship scores range 9 to 63 with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of California, San Francisco
🇺🇸San Francisco, California, United States