Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05915273
NCT05915273CompletedNot Applicable

Relapse and Failure Rates Between CAD/CAM and Conventional Fixed Retainers: A 2-year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Nourhan M.Aly1 site in 1 country43 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2019Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
43
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in Little's Irregularity Index (LII)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to compare the differences in relapse and failure rates in patients treated with fixed retainers (FRs) using Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing technology, lab-based technique, and chairside method.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
13 Years to — (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •completion of comprehensive orthodontic treatment
  • •class I molar and canine relationships
  • •indication for a fixed retainer on the mandibular anterior teeth.
  • •no extractions done as part of their treatment.
  • •Treatment with preadjusted edgewise appliance.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •refusal to participate
  • •refusal to have fixed retainers
  • •poor oral hygiene
  • •non-compliance

Arms & Interventions

CAD/CAM group

Experimental

Intervention: Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacturing Retainers (Other)

Lab group

Active Comparator

Intervention: Lab-based Retainers (Other)

Chairside group

Active Comparator

Intervention: Chairside Retainers (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Little's Irregularity Index (LII)

Time Frame: 2 years

ICW was measured on the Meshlab software using the 3D ruler measurement tool. Pre-treatment, post-treatment, and post-retention measures were recorded and any change in the LII was considered relapse.

Change in intercanine width (ICW)

Time Frame: 2 years

ICW was measured on the Meshlab software using the 3D ruler measurement tool. Pre-treatment, post-treatment, and post-retention measures were recorded and any change in the ICW was considered relapse.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Nourhan M.Aly
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Nourhan M.Aly

Assistant Lecturer of Dental Public Health

University of Alexandria

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials