Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02396836
NCT02396836CompletedNot Applicable

Randomised Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Two Hand Hygiene Techniques Using Alcohol Based Hand Rub on Hand Surface Coverage and Reducing Bacterial Hand Contamination

Glasgow Caledonian University1 site in 1 country120 target enrollmentStarted: November 1, 2013Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
120
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Microbial load on dominant hand

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim is to compare the effectiveness of the 6 step hand rub technique versus 3 step hand rub technique in hand coverage and in reducing bacterial contamination on the hands of healthcare workers in practice.

Research questions

  1. What is the effectiveness of the 6 step technique in hand coverage compared to the 3 step technique?

  2. What are the most frequently missed sites in hand surface coverage using 6 steps compared to 3 steps?

  3. What is the reduction in bacterial contamination of the hand with the 6 step compared to the 3 step technique?

  4. Does site missed or coverage relate to bacterial load?

  5. What is the time taken for 6 step technique versus 3 step technique?

Detailed Description

The 6 step for decontamination of healthcare workers hand is recommended by the World Health Organization but the 3 step technique is easy to perform and has been shown by some studies to be effective. Compliance with the 6 step technique is not optimum. If the 3 step was more as or more effective than the 6 step compliance with it could be compared with that for the 6 step. No randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of these two techniques using alcohol based hand rub has been conducted.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Medical and nursing staff performing a clinical procedure

Exclusion Criteria

  • •A procedure requiring use of gloves
  • •A self declared active skin condition

Arms & Interventions

6 step hand hygiene technique

Active Comparator

Hand decontamination with alcohol hand rub using the World Health Organisations 6 step technique

Intervention: 6 step technique (Other)

3 step hand hygiene technique

Experimental

Hand decontamination with alcohol hand rub using the 3 step technique

Intervention: 3 step technique (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Microbial load on dominant hand

Time Frame: up to 5 min

A glove juice technique will be used to assess the microbial load on the dominant hand of healthcare workers following use of alcohol hand rub after a clinical procedure.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Hand coverage(up to 5 min)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Jacqui Reilly

Professor Jacqui Reilly

Glasgow Caledonian University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials