Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response or Are Intolerant to Biologic DMARD Therapy
- Conditions
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT04115839
- Lead Sponsor
- Gilead Sciences
- Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of filgotinib compared to placebo as assessed by the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response in participants with active psoriatic arthritis who have an inadequate response or are intolerant to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) therapy.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 106
-
Male or female participants who are 18-75 years of age (19-75 years of age at sites in Republic of Korea, 20-75 years of age at sites in Japan and Taiwan), on the day of signing initial informed consent
-
Meet Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR)
-
Have a history consistent with Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) ≥ 6 months at Screening
-
Have active PsA defined as ≥ 3 swollen joints (from a 66 swollen joint count [SJC]) and ≥ 3 tender joints (from a 68 tender joint count [TJC]) at Screening and Day 1; these may or may not be the same joints at Screening and Day 1
-
Must have a documented history or active signs of at least one of the following at Screening
- Plaque psoriasis
- Nail changes attributed to psoriasis
-
Have had inadequate response (lack of efficacy after ≥ 12 week duration of therapy) or intolerance to at least one and not more than 3 biologic DMARDs (bioDMARD) administered for the treatment of PsA or psoriasis, as per local guidelines / standard of care
-
Prior to the first dose of study drug on Day 1, treatment with bioDMARD(s) should have been discontinued
Key
- Prior exposure to a janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor > 2 doses
- Any active / recent infection
- Any chronic and / or uncontrolled medical condition that would put the individual at increased risk during study participation or circumstances which may make a individual unlikely or unable to complete or comply with study procedures and requirements, per investigator judgement
- Any moderately to severely active musculoskeletal or skin disorder other than PsA or plaque psoriasis that would interfere with assessment of study parameters, as per judgement of investigator
NOTE: Prior history of reactive arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis is permitted if there is documentation of change in diagnosis to PsA or additional diagnosis of PsA
- Any history of an inflammatory arthropathy with onset before age of 16 years old
- Active autoimmune disease that would interfere with assessment of study parameters or increase risk to the individual by participating in the study, (e.g. uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease, uncontrolled thyroiditis, systemic vasculitis, transverse myelitis), per judgement of investigator
- Pregnancy or nursing females
- Active drug or alcohol abuse, as per judgement of investigator
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study) Filgotinib Participants will receive filgotinib 200 mg + placebo to match (PTM) filgotinib 100 mg for up to 16 weeks. Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study) Filgotinib Participants will receive PTM filgotinib 200 mg + filgotinib 100 mg for up to 16 weeks. Filgotinib 200 mg (LTE) Filgotinib Participants will receive filgotinib 200 mg + PTM filgotinib 100 mg for up to 44 weeks. Filgotinib 100 mg (LTE) Filgotinib Participants will receive PTM filgotinib 200 mg + filgotinib 100 mg for up to 44 weeks. Placebo (Main Study) Placebo to match filgotinib Participants will receive PTM filgotinib 200 mg + PTM filgotinib 100 mg for up to 16 weeks. Filgotinib 200 mg (LTE) Placebo to match filgotinib Participants will receive filgotinib 200 mg + PTM filgotinib 100 mg for up to 44 weeks. Filgotinib 100 mg (LTE) Placebo to match filgotinib Participants will receive PTM filgotinib 200 mg + filgotinib 100 mg for up to 44 weeks. Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study) Placebo to match filgotinib Participants will receive filgotinib 200 mg + placebo to match (PTM) filgotinib 100 mg for up to 16 weeks. Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study) Placebo to match filgotinib Participants will receive PTM filgotinib 200 mg + filgotinib 100 mg for up to 16 weeks.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement Response at Week 12 Week 12 ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in tender joint count based on 68 joints (TJC68), swollen joint count based on 66 joints (SJC66) and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: patient's global assessment of disease activity (PGADA) using a visual analogue scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); physician's global assessment of disease activity (PHGADA) using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline in LDI at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 in Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline Baseline, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 weeks LDI quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with an at least 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit. The control digit is either the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot), or if the contralateral digit is also affected, values from a standard reference table. LDI measures the ratio of the circumference of affected digit to circumference of digit on contralateral hand or foot using a Leeds Dactylometer. LDI score is calculated based on the circumference of the dactylitic finger/toe (mm), circumference of contralateral digit (mm), tenderness score (0 = no tenderness, 1 = tender). Tenderness of affected digits is assessed on a scale from 0 (no tenderness) to 3 (tender and withdrawn). A higher LDI indicates worse dactylitis. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks The HAQ-DI score is defined as the average of the scores of eight functional categories (dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities), usually completed by the participant. Responses in each functional category are collected as 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do a task in that area), with or without aids or devices. The eight category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI score on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). When 6 or more categories are non-missing, total possible score is 3. If more than 2 categories are missing, the HAQ-DI score is set to missing. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (less disability).
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Baseline, 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 weeks The HAQ-DI score is defined as the average of the scores of eight functional categories (dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities), usually completed by the participant. Responses in each functional category are collected as 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do a task in that area), with or without aids or devices. The eight category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI score on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). When 6 or more categories are non-missing, total possible score is 3. If more than 2 categories are missing, the HAQ-DI score is set to missing. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (less disability).
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16 Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks FACIT-Fatigue scale is a brief, 13-item, symptom-specific questionnaire that specifically assesses the self-reported severity of fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and functioning in the past 7 days. The FACIT-Fatigue uses 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) numeric rating scales for a total possible score of 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate less fatigue. Positive change in value indicates improvement (no or less severity of fatigue).
Change From Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48 Baseline, Week 48 FACIT-Fatigue scale is a brief, 13-item, symptom-specific questionnaire that specifically assesses the self-reported severity of fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and functioning in the past 7 days. The FACIT-Fatigue uses 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) numeric rating scales for a total possible score of 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. Positive change in value indicates improvement (no or less severity of fatigue).
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16 Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, and 2 component scores (MCS and PCS). MCS consists of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement (better health status).
Change From Baseline in MCS of the SF-36v2 at Week 48 Baseline, Week 48 The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, and 2 component scores (MCS and PCS). MCS consists of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement (better health status).
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16 Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, and 2 component scores (MCS and PCS). PCS consists of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement (better health status).
Change From Baseline in PCS of the SF-36v2 at Week 48 Baseline, Week 48 The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, and 2 component scores (MCS and PCS). PCS consists of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement (better health status).
Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16 Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. The PASDAS includes the following components: PGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\]; PhGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity)\]; 36-item short form survey (SF-36) \[a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains used to determine a physical component summary (PCS) with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status\]; TJC68; SJC66; leeds enthesitis index (LEI) \[assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis\]; Tender dactylitis count (TDC) \[with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis\]; C-reactive protein (CRP). The score of PASDAS ranges from 0-10, lower scores indicates better function. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in PASDAS at Week 48 Baseline, Week 48 PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. The PASDAS includes the following components: PGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\]; PhGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity)\]; 36-item short form survey (SF-36) \[a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains used to determine a physical component summary (PCS) with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status\]; TJC68; SJC66; leeds enthesitis index (LEI) \[assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis\]; Tender dactylitis count (TDC) \[with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis\]; C-reactive protein (CRP). The score of PASDAS ranges from 0-10, lower scores indicates better function. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 MDA is a measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on a composite score of 7 domains. A participant is considered as having achieved the MDA if the participant fulfills at least 5 of the following 7 criteria: TJC68 ≤1; SJC66 ≤1; Psoriatic arthritis disease activity score (PASI) ≤1 for participants with psoriasis covering BSA \<3% \[PASI evaluates the severity and extent of psoriasis. In PASI, body is divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area is assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)\]; PGAPI ≤15 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\]; PGADA ≤20 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\]; HAQ-DI score ≤0.5; LEI score ≤1 for participants with enthesitis at baseline.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MDA Response at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 MDA is a measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on a composite score of 7 domains. A participant is considered as having achieved the MDA if the participant fulfills at least 5 of the following 7 criteria: TJC68 ≤1; SJC66 ≤1; Psoriatic arthritis disease activity score (PASI) ≤1 for participants with psoriasis covering BSA \<3% \[PASI evaluates the severity and extent of psoriasis. In PASI, body is divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area is assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)\]; PGAPI ≤15 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\]; PGADA ≤20 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\]; HAQ-DI score ≤0.5; LEI score ≤1 for participants with enthesitis at baseline.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 VLDA is a measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on a composite score of 7 domains. A participant is considered as having achieved the VLDA if the participant fulfills all the seven criteria: TJC68 ≤1; SJC66 ≤1; PASI score ≤1 for participants with psoriasis covering BSA \<3% \[PASI evaluates the severity and extent of psoriasis. In PASI, body is divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area is assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)\]; PGAPI ≤15 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to (serious pain)\]; PGADA ≤20 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\]; HAQ-DI score ≤0.5; LEI score ≤1 with participants with enthesitis at baseline.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved VLDA Response at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 VLDA is a measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on a composite score of 7 domains. A participant is considered as having achieved the VLDA if the participant fulfills all the seven criteria: TJC68 ≤1; SJC66 ≤1; PASI score ≤1 for participants with psoriasis covering BSA \<3% \[PASI evaluates the severity and extent of psoriasis. In PASI, body is divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area is assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)\]; PGAPI ≤15 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to (serious pain)\]; PGADA ≤20 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\]; HAQ-DI score ≤0.5; LEI score ≤1 with participants with enthesitis at baseline.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)\]; PGAPI \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and \>28 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in DAPSA at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Baseline, 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 weeks DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)\]; PGAPI \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and \>28 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at Baseline Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks The PhGAP is used to determine the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point. The participant's psoriasis disease activity is assessed by a physician according to the grades of induration, erythema, and scaling on a scale of 0 to 5. The sum of the three grades is used to obtain the total average score. PhGAP is based on the total average score on a scale of 0-5 where, 0 = cleared, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = marked, and 5 = severe. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in PhGAP at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline Baseline, 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 weeks The PhGAP is used to determine the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point. The participant's psoriasis disease activity is assessed by a physician according to the grades of induration, erythema, and scaling on a scale of 0 to 5. The sum of the three grades is used to obtain the total average score. PhGAP is based on the total average score on a scale of 0-5 where, 0 = cleared, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = marked, and 5 = severe. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at Baseline Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks mNAPSI is used to assess each nail abnormality for each of the participant's nails. Three features or groups of features (pitting, onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, and crumbling) of each fingernail are graded on a scale from 0 (no onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, no pitting, no crumbling) to 3 (\>30 onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, \>50 pitting, \>50% crumbling). Four features (leukonychia, splinter, hemorrhages, hyperkeratosis, and red spots in the lunula) are graded with the score of 1 = present or 0 = absent for each fingernail. Each finger has a score between 0 and 13. The total mNAPSI score is the sum of all abnormalities individual score across all fingers, and the total mNAPSI score ranges from 0 to 130. Lower numbers indicate fewer nail abnormalities. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in mNAPSI at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at Baseline Baseline, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 weeks mNAPSI is used to assess each nail abnormality for each of the participant's nails. Three features or groups of features (pitting, onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, and crumbling) of each fingernail are graded on a scale from 0 (no onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, no pitting, no crumbling) to 3 (\>30 onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, \>50 pitting, \>50% crumbling). Four features (leukonychia, splinter, hemorrhages, hyperkeratosis, and red spots in the lunula) are graded with the score of 1 = present or 0 = absent for each fingernail. Each finger has a score between 0 and 13. The total mNAPSI score is the sum of all abnormalities individual score across all fingers, and the total mNAPSI score ranges from 0 to 130. Lower numbers indicate fewer nail abnormalities. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks Enthesitis is assessed using LEI. The enthesitis examination by LEI evaluates the presence or absence of pain by applying local pressure on 6 anatomical sites: medial femoral condyle (left and right), lateral epicondyle (left and right), and the achilles tendon insertion (left and right). Enthesitis at each site is scored as 0 (enthesitis absent) and 1 (enthesitis present). LEI is derived as the sum of the enthesitis score over the 6 sites mentioned above. The total score ranges from 0 to 6, higher scores indicates greater degree of enthesitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in LEI at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline Baseline, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 weeks Enthesitis is assessed using LEI. The enthesitis examination by LEI evaluates the presence or absence of pain by applying local pressure on 6 anatomical sites: medial femoral condyle (left and right), lateral epicondyle (left and right), and the achilles tendon insertion (left and right). Enthesitis at each site is scored as 0 (enthesitis absent) and 1 (enthesitis present). LEI is derived as the sum of the enthesitis score over the 6 sites mentioned above. The total score ranges from 0 to 6, higher scores indicates greater degree of enthesitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16 Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks The PsAID questionnaire assesses the impact of PsA on people's lives. The PsAID is calculated based on 12 numerical rating scales (NRS) questions. The 12 NRS is focused on pain, fatigue, skin, work and/or leisure activities, function, discomfort, sleep, coping, anxiety, embarrassment, social life, and depression. Each NRS is assessed as a number between 0 and 10. Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores, (some of which were multiplied by a weighting factor) divided by 20 for a total possible score of 0 to 10, where higher score indicates worse impact of disease. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in PsAID-12 Score at Week 48 Baseline, Week 48 The PsAID questionnaire assesses the impact of PsA on people's lives. The PsAID is calculated based on 12 numerical rating scales (NRS) questions. The 12 NRS is focused on pain, fatigue, skin, work and/or leisure activities, function, discomfort, sleep, coping, anxiety, embarrassment, social life, and depression. Each NRS is assessed as a number between 0 and 10. Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores, (some of which were multiplied by a weighting factor) divided by 20 for a total possible score of 0 to 10, where higher score indicates worse impact of disease. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants With PASDAS Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Weeks 4 and 16 Weeks 4 and 16 PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. The PASDAS includes the following components: PGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\]; PhGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity)\]; 36-item short form survey (SF-36) \[a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains used to determine a PCS with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status\]; TJC68; SJC66; LEI \[assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis\]; TDC \[with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis\]; CRP. The score of PASDAS ranges from 0-10, lower score indicates better function. PASDAS LDA is defined as PASDAS ≤ 3.2.
Percentage of Participants With PASDAS LDA at Week 48 Week 48 PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. The PASDAS includes the following components: PGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\]; PhGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity)\]; 36-item short form survey (SF-36) \[a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains used to determine a PCS with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status\]; TJC68; SJC66; LEI \[assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis\]; TDC \[with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis\]; CRP. The score of PASDAS ranges from 0-10, lower score indicates better function. PASDAS LDA is defined as PASDAS ≤ 3.2.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.
Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks TJC68 is an assessment of 68 joints. Each joint is evaluated as 'normal', 'tender', 'tender and swollen', or 'not able to evaluate'. It is derived as the sum of all tender joints. The overall tender joint count ranged from 0 to 68, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of tenderness. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: TJC68 at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Baseline, 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 weeks TJC68 is an assessment of 68 joints. Each joint is evaluated as 'normal', 'tender', 'tender and swollen', or 'not able to evaluate'. It is derived as the sum of all tender joints. The overall tender joint count ranged from 0 to 68, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of tenderness. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASDAS Remission at Weeks 4 and 16 Weeks 4 and 16 PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. The PASDAS includes the following components: PGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\]; PhGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity)\]; 36-item short form survey (SF-36) \[a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains used to determine a PCS with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status\]; TJC68; SJC66; LEI \[assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis\]; TDC \[with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis\]; CRP. The score of PASDAS ranges from 0-10, lower score indicates better function. PASDAS remission is defined as PASDAS ≤ 1.9.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASDAS Remission at Week 48 Week 48 PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. The PASDAS includes the following components: PGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\]; PhGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity)\]; 36-item short form survey (SF-36) \[a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains used to determine a PCS with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status\]; TJC68; SJC66; LEI \[assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis\]; TDC \[with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis\]; CRP. The score of PASDAS ranges from 0-10, lower score indicates better function. PASDAS remission is defined as PASDAS ≤ 1.9.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 ACR50 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.
Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks PGADA is assessed by the participants using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: PGADA at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Baseline, 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 weeks PGADA is assessed by the participants using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks PhGADA is assessed by the physician using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: PhGADA at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Baseline, 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 weeks PhGADA is assessed by the physician using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks HAQ-DI's pain assessment is done using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Baseline, 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 weeks HAQ-DI's pain assessment is done using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C- Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks The hsCRP is the ACR core set measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of filgotinib on the participant's psoriatic arthritis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 ACR50 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 ACR70 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 ACR70 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.
Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks SJC66 is an assessment of 66 joints. Each joint was evaluated as 'normal', 'swollen', 'tender and swollen', or 'not able to evaluate'. It is derived as the sum of all swollen joints. The overall swollen joint count ranged from 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in ACR Component: SJC66 at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Baseline, 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 weeks SJC66 is an assessment of 66 joints. Each joint was evaluated as 'normal', 'swollen', 'tender and swollen', or 'not able to evaluate'. It is derived as the sum of all swollen joints. The overall swollen joint count ranged from 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: hsCRP at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Baseline, 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 weeks The hsCRP is the ACR core set measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of filgotinib on the participant's psoriatic arthritis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks The DAS28(CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\] and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48 and 60 Baseline, 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48 and 60 weeks The DAS28(CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\] and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) LDA is defined as DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) LDA is defined as DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) remission is defined as DAS28 (CRP) \< 2.6.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) Remission at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) remission is defined as DAS28 (CRP) \< 2.6.
Time to Achieve DAS28(CRP) LDA Approximately 16 weeks The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) LDA is defined as DAS28 (CRP) ≤ 3.2. Time to achieve DAS28(CRP) LDA is the number of days from the first dose date of study drug administration to the first time when a participant achieves DAS28(CRP) LDA.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)\]; PGAPI \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and \>28 = high disease activity. DAPSA LDA is defined as DAPSA ≤ 14.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)\]; PGAPI \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and \>28 = high disease activity. DAPSA LDA is defined as DAPSA ≤ 14.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)\]; PGAPI \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and \>28 = high disease activity. DAPSA remission is defined as DAPSA ≤ 4.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)\]; PGAPI \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and \>28 = high disease activity. DAPSA remission is defined as DAPSA ≤ 4.
Time to Achieve DAPSA LDA Approximately 16 weeks DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)\]; PGAPI \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and \>28 = high disease activity. DAPSA LDA is defined as DAPSA ≤ 14. Time to achieve DAPSA LDA is the number of days from the first dose date of study drug administration to the first time when a participant achieves DAPSA LDA. If the DAPSA LDA is not achieved during main study phase, the time to achieve DAPSA LDA will be censored at the last non-missing DAPSA LDA assessment date during main study phase. If the component scores of DAPSA LDA are at different dates for a visit, the latest date will be used for the derivation of time to achieve DAPSA LDA.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 The PsARC response was defined as improvement in at least 2 of the following 4 criteria; ≥ 30% decrease in SJC66, ≥ 30% decrease in TJC68, ≥ 20% decrease in PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), ≥ 20% decrease in PhGADA (VAS; 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity) and with at least one of the 2 joint criteria, with no deterioration in any other criteria.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PsARC Response at Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 Weeks 18, 20, 24, 28, 36, 48, and 60 The PsARC response was defined as improvement in at least 2 of the following 4 criteria; ≥ 30% decrease in SJC66, ≥ 30% decrease in TJC68, ≥ 20% decrease in PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), ≥ 20% decrease in PhGADA (VAS; 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity) and with at least one of the 2 joint criteria, with no deterioration in any other criteria.
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). A higher score indicates more severe disease. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline Baseline, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 weeks PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). A higher score indicates more severe disease. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI50, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 50%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI50 Response at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI50, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 50%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI75, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 75%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI75 Response at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI75, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 75%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI90, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 90%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Change From Baseline in SPARCC Enthesitis Index at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline Baseline, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 weeks The enthesitis examination is based on the 16 anatomical sites: the medial epicondyle (left and right), the lateral epicondyle (left and right), the supraspinatus insertion (left and right), the bilateral greater trochanter (left and right), the quadriceps tendon insertion into superior border of patella (left and right), the patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tuberosity (left and right), the achilles tendon insertion (left and right), and the plantar fascia insertion (left and right). Enthesitis at each site is scored as either 0 (enthesitis absent) and 1 (enthesitis present). SPARCC enthesitis index has an overall total score ranging from 0 to 16. Higher score indicates a greater number of sites that are affected by enthesitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI90 Response at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI90, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 90%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI100, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 100%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks LDI quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with an at least 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit. The control digit is either the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot), or if the contralateral digit is also affected, values from a standard reference table. LDI measures the ratio of the circumference of affected digit to circumference of digit on contralateral hand or foot using a Leeds Dactylometer. LDI score is calculated based on circumference of the dactylitic finger/toe (mm), circumference of the contralateral digit (mm), tenderness score (0 = no tenderness, 1 = tender). Tenderness of affected digits is assessed on a scale from 0 (no tenderness) to 3 (tender and withdrawn). A higher LDI indicates worse dactylitis. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI100 Response at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI100, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 100%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks The enthesitis examination is based on the 16 anatomical sites: the medial epicondyle (left and right), the lateral epicondyle (left and right), the supraspinatus insertion (left and right), the bilateral greater trochanter (left and right), the quadriceps tendon insertion into superior border of patella (left and right), the patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tuberosity (left and right), the achilles tendon insertion (left and right), and the plantar fascia insertion (left and right). Enthesitis at each site is scored as either 0 (enthesitis absent) and 1 (enthesitis present). SPARCC enthesitis index has an overall total score ranging from 0 to 16. Higher score indicates a greater number of sites that are affected by enthesitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks Tender score (0 = no tenderness, 1 = tender, 2 = tender and wince, 3 = tender and withdraw) is collected for Dactylitis Assessments on the Dactylitis Score Sheet that is used for calculation of LDI total score. Tender dactylitis count (TDC) equals the number of tender fingers and toes (tendor score \>0). For participants with dactylitis status absent for all the fingers and toes, the TDC is set as 0. The total score range of TDC is from 0 to 60, higher scores indicate greater presence of dactylitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in TDC at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 in Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline Baseline, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 weeks Tender score (0 = no tenderness, 1 = tender, 2 = tender and wince, 3 = tender and withdraw) is collected for Dactylitis Assessments on the Dactylitis Score Sheet that is used for calculation of LDI total score. Tender dactylitis count (TDC) equals the number of tender fingers and toes (tendor score \>0). For participants with dactylitis status absent for all the fingers and toes, the TDC is set as 0. The total score range of TDC is from 0 to 60, higher scores indicate greater presence of dactylitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Trial Locations
- Locations (59)
G.R.M.O. (Groupe de recherche en maladies osseuses) Inc.
🇨🇦Quebec, Canada
Keio University Hospital
🇯🇵Tokyo, Japan
Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Katowicach
🇵🇱Katowice, Poland
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Avenida de Cordoba, s/n, Madrid, Spain, 28041
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez, 17 Rheumatology Service, Valencia, Spain,
🇪🇸Valencia, Spain
National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center
🇯🇵Kawachinagano, Japan
Nagoya City University Hospital
🇯🇵Nagoya-City, Japan
San Marcus Research Clinic, Inc.
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
Arthritis Group, PC
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Jefrey D. Lieberman, ND, P.C.
🇺🇸Decatur, Georgia, United States
Klein & Associates, M.D., P.A.
🇺🇸Hagerstown, Maryland, United States
Articularis Healthcare Inc, dba, Columbia Arthritis Center, PA
🇺🇸Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Omega Research Debary, LLC
🇺🇸DeBary, Florida, United States
Medvin Clinical Research
🇺🇸Covina, California, United States
Bluegrass Community Research, Inc.
🇺🇸Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Arthritis Center, Inc.
🇺🇸Palm Harbor, Florida, United States
Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC
🇺🇸Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, United States
Arthritis Consultants, Inc.
🇺🇸Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
St. Paul Rheumatology, P.A.
🇺🇸Eagan, Minnesota, United States
Atlantic Coast Research
🇺🇸Toms River, New Jersey, United States
Clinical Research Source Inc
🇺🇸Perrysburg, Ohio, United States
Joint and Muscle Research Institute
🇺🇸Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Paramount Medical Research & Consulting, LLC
🇺🇸Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States
Altoona Center for Clinical Research
🇺🇸Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
PA Regional Center for Arthritis and Osteoporosis Research
🇺🇸Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States
ACME Research, LLC
🇺🇸Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States
West Virginia Research Institute PLLC
🇺🇸South Charleston, West Virginia, United States
Southwest Rheumatology Research, LLC
🇺🇸Mesquite, Texas, United States
Arthritis & Osteoporosis Clinic of Brazos Valley (Drug Shipment Address)
🇺🇸College Station, Texas, United States
CHU UCL Namur - Site Godinne
🇧🇪Yvoir, Belgium
Rheumatology Research Unit
🇦🇺Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia
Emeritus Research
🇦🇺Camberwell, Victoria, Australia
Genesis Research Services
🇦🇺Broadmeadow, New South Wales, Australia
CCR Czech a.s.
🇨🇿Pardubice, Czechia
NSZOZ Unica CR
🇵🇱Dabrówka, Poland
Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft.
🇭🇺Budapest, Hungary
Reumatologie a Osteologie MEDICAL PLUS s.r.o., Rezidence Hradebni, Obchodni 1507, Uherske Hradiste, 68601
🇨🇿Uherske Hradiste, Czechia
Bekes Megeyi Kozponti Korhaz, Reumatologiai Osztaly
🇭🇺Gyula, Hungary
Csongrad Megyei Dr. Bugyi Istvan Korhaz, Mozgasszervi Rehabilitacios Osztaly
🇭🇺Szentes, Hungary
Daido Clinic
🇯🇵Nagoya, Japan
Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center
🇯🇵Hachioji-shi, Japan
Inha University Hospital
🇰🇷Incheon, Korea, Republic of
Seoul National University Hospital
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of
SMG - SNU Boramae Medical Center
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Rheuma Medicus Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej
🇵🇱Warsaw, Poland
Centrum Medyczne AMED Warszawa Targowek
🇵🇱Warszawa, Poland
ARS RHEUMATICA Sp. Z.o.o.
🇵🇱Warszawa, Mazowieckie, Poland
Centrum Medyczne Oporow
🇵🇱Wroclaw, Poland
Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada - Rheumatology Department, Camino Del Molino no 2, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, 28942
🇪🇸Fuenlabrada, Spain
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Rheumatology Service, Avda. Valdecilla s/n, 39008
🇪🇸Santander, Spain
Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli, Parc Tauli 1, Rheumatology Service, Sabadell, Barcelona, 08208
🇪🇸Sabadell, Spain
Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital
🇨🇳Dailin Township, Taiwan
Hospital Universitario La Paz. Paseo de la Castellana 261, Madrid, 28046
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
🇪🇸Sevilla, Spain
Chi Mei Medical Center
🇨🇳Tainan, Taiwan
Chang Gung Medical Foundation Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
🇨🇳Taipei, Taiwan
Taipei Medical University Hospital
🇨🇳Taipei, Taiwan
Centrum Badan Klinicznych PI-House sp. z o.o
🇵🇱Gdansk, Poland
Gabinet Internistyczno-Reumatologiczny Piotr Adrian Klimiuk
🇵🇱Bialystok, Podlaskie, Poland