The Effect of Breathing Exercise and Affirmation Method Used in Labor on Women's Birth Self-Efficacy and Satisfaction
- Conditions
- Birth Self-efficacyBirth Satisfaction
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Breathing ExerciseBehavioral: Affirmation MethodBehavioral: Breathing Exercise and Affirmation Method
- Registration Number
- NCT06442917
- Lead Sponsor
- Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University
- Brief Summary
Purpose: This research was conducted to determine the effect of breathing exercise and affirmation method used in labor on women's birth self-efficacy and satisfaction.
Materials and Methods: The sample of the study, in which the randomized controlled experimental design type was applied, consisted of 128 nulliparous pregnant women. Data were collected with Pregnant Descriptive Information Form, Innate Period Evaluation Form, Visual Analog Scale, Affirmation Statement Evaluation Form, Short Form of the Childbirth of Self-Efficacy Inventory and Birth Satisfaction Scale. Pregnant women who are in the first stage of labor have been using diaphragmatic breathing exercise to one group, affirmation method to one group, both diaphragmatic exercise and affirmation method to one group since the active phase, while pregnant women in the control group have not been given any intervention, they have received routine care. Descriptive statistical methods, chi-square test, one-way analysis of variance, t-test for dependent and independent groups were used in the analysis of the data.
- Detailed Description
This study was conducted in four groups. Groups; The group in which the affirmation method was used in labor (Affirmation Group - OG), the group in which breathing exercises were used in labor (Breathing Group - NG), the group in which both breathing exercises and affirmation methods were used in labor (Breathing and Affirmation Group - NOG), and the group in which no intervention was made other than routine hospital practices. It is divided into a non-existent group (Control Group - CG). The numbers given to the groups (1, 2, 3, 4) were determined by the lottery method. The name of each group was written on the papers and numbered in order of drawing. The numbers 3 were assigned to the Breathing group, 1 to the Affirmation group, 2 to the Breathing and Affirmation group, and 4 to the Control group. Considering data loss in the distribution of the study into groups, numbers from 1 to 200 were randomized for 4 groups using a computer-assisted randomization program (https://www.rstudio.com). In order to ensure homogeneity in the randomization of the intervention groups and the control group, five matching criteria were taken into consideration. These match criteria; It was determined as the mother's age, education level (secondary school and below, high school and above), employment status (working/not working), gestational age, and prenatal education. Homogeneity of the groups was tested in the evaluation of the study.
Pregnant women to be included in the study were assigned to groups according to the numbers in the columns according to the eligibility criteria. In order to avoid being influenced by each other, pregnant women were included in the study one by one, and after the birth of one pregnant woman was completed, the other pregnant woman was included in the study.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 128
The one who is open to communication,
-
between the ages of 18-45 Dec,
-
At least a primary school graduate,
* Nulliparous,
-
Non-risky pregnancy in terms of mother and baby (multiple pregnancy, preeclampsia, etc.),
* In the first stage of labor (0-3 cm dilatation), which is,
-
Living at term and having a single pregnancy,
-
No analgesic or anesthetic substance is applied during the trauma, * Pregnant women who volunteer to participate in the research
- Your mother wants to leave without working, * Pregnant women who developed cesarean section indication after being included in the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Breathing Exercise Group Breathing Exercise 32 the Pregnant Identifying Characteristics Form, the Short Version of the Self-Efficacy Scale in Childbirth was completed before the pregnancy intervention and the VAS was measured. Affirmation Method Group Affirmation Method 32 pregnant women who were admitted to the hospital for childbirth and were in the latent phase (0-3 cm) filled out the pre-intervention Pregnant Identifying Characteristics Form, the Short Version of the Self-Efficacy Scale in Childbirth, and the VAS was measured. Breathing Exercise and Affirmation Method Group Breathing Exercise and Affirmation Method During the latent phase, affirmation phrases were shown to the pregnant women and the application was explained and the application was made with breathing exercise training.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method birth self-efficacy scale in the active phase of labor birth self-efficacy of pregnant women.The lowest total score that can be obtained from the scale is 32, and the highest total score is 320. As the scores from the scale increase, the self-efficacy levels of pregnant women in labor increase.
birth satisfaction scale in the active phase of labor birth satisfaction of pregnant women.As a result of the scale, a score between 0 and 40 is received. It is interpreted that as the score obtained as a result of the scale increases, the woman's birth satisfaction increases, while a low score indicates that the birth satisfaction is not at a sufficient level.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
🇹🇷Çanakkale, Turkey