The Effectiveness of a "CARE I DECIDE！" Scenario-Based Online Simulation Training Program in Chest Trauma Care Knowledge and Clinical Reasoning Ability Among Nurses
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 95
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Chest Trauma Knowledge，Clinical Reasoning Scale
研究概览
简要总结
Methods This randomized controlled trial evaluated teaching strategies for chest trauma education. The course was promoted via posters and conducted over two days, with two sessions per day. Sessions were randomly assigned to the control or experimental group via a lottery system before the course. This process was repeated on day two. A total of 67 participants per group were recruited, ensuring 50% random allocation. Control Group Participants received traditional classroom instruction with case discussions. Pretest: Collected demographic data and assessed baseline knowledge using the Chest Trauma Knowledge Scale (CTKS) and Nursing Clinical Decision-Making Scale (NCDMS). First posttest (1-week follow-up): Measured CTKS, NCDMS, and Learning Engagement Scale (LES). Second posttest (3-month follow-up): Assessed CTKS and Confidence in Nursing Clinical Reasoning Scale (CNCRS). Experimental Group Participants received traditional instruction plus "CARE! I-DECIDE" online simulation. Pretest: Same as the control group. First posttest (1-week follow-up): Measured CTKS, NCDMS, and LES. Second posttest (3-month follow-up): Assessed CTKS and CNCRS. Assessments were completed via Google Forms or paper-based questionnaires. This study compared traditional teaching with blended learning using online simulation, evaluating immediate and delayed outcomes.
详细描述
Background In Taiwan, accidental injuries remain a major cause of death, with thoracic trauma being a significant contributor to severe cases. Nurses must develop rapid assessment, management, and clinical reasoning skills to improve trauma care. However, trauma training is often limited by spatial and financial constraints, restricting ongoing education. The "Care I Decide!" online simulation-assisted teaching provides a flexible, accessible solution for continuous thoracic trauma training, enhancing nurses' knowledge and clinical reasoning skills.
Purpose This study assessed the effectiveness of "Care I Decide!" in improving nurses' thoracic trauma knowledge and clinical reasoning skills.
Method This randomized controlled trial (RCT) used a two-group, repeated-measures design with 95 ER and surgical nurses from a regional teaching hospital in Northern Taiwan.
- Experimental group (n=49): Received classroom teaching + "Care I Decide!" online simulation.
- Control group (n=46): Received classroom teaching + case sharing.
Participants completed:
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Professional Setting:
- •Nurses working in emergency departments or specific surgical specialties, including thoracic surgery, neurosurgery, general surgery, and orthopedics.
- •Willingness to Participate:
- •Nurses who voluntarily agree to participate in this study.
排除标准
- •Non-Surgical Nurses:
- •Nurses from non-surgical departments or those not meeting the inclusion criteria within other surgical specialties.
- •Non-Frontline Care Providers:
- •Nurses not directly involved in the clinical care of chest trauma patients, such as outpatient nurses or case managers.
- •Incomplete Participation:
- •Nurses who do not complete the full course of the study program.
研究组 & 干预措施
Experimental Group
The experimental group received "Care I Decide!" online simulation-assisted teaching following the classroom-based instruction.
Classroom-Based Teaching and Online Simulation-Assisted Instruction
Classroom-Based Instruction:
Participants were provided with a QR code to access the Moodle platform and download the electronic course materials.
The classroom instruction covered the following topics:
Mechanisms of trauma and prehospital assessment. Principles of major trauma activation and evaluation. Types of chest trauma and associated clinical signs. Principles of chest trauma care and recognition of changes in patient conditions.
"Care I Decide!" Online Simulation-Assisted Teaching:
A detailed explanation of the operational process for the "Care I Decide!" online simulation-assisted teaching materials was provided.
The session integrated classroom knowledge with the "Care I Decide!" online simulation. It presented clinical scenarios involving changes in vital signs and symptoms.
干预措施: Scenario-Based Online Simulation Training Program (Other)
Control Group
The control group received traditional case sharing following the classroom-based instruction.
Classroom-Based Teaching
Delivery of Course Materials:
Participants were provided with a QR code to access the Moodle platform, where they could download the electronic course handouts.
Classroom Instruction Content:
The classroom teaching session included the following topics:
Mechanisms of trauma and prehospital assessment. Principles of major trauma activation and evaluation. Types of chest trauma and associated clinical signs. Principles of chest trauma care and recognition of changes in patient conditions.
Chest Trauma Case Sharing
Case Presentation and Reflection:
Clinical cases involving chest trauma were presented to participants. They were guided to describe the case details, reflect on the management process, and receive constructive feedback.
Discussion and Problem Solving:
During the discussion, questions and uncertainties raised by participants were addressed
干预措施: Classroom-Based Teaching (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Chest Trauma Knowledge，Clinical Reasoning Scale
时间窗: 6months
Primary Outcome Measures: Chest Trauma Care Knowledge Scale：Measures knowledge of chest trauma care.Time Points: Before the intervention, right after the intervention, and 12 weeks later.Clinical Reasoning Scale：Assesses clinical reasoning skills in chest trauma care.Time Points: Before the intervention, right after the intervention, and 12 weeks later.Learning Engagement Scale：Evaluates participants' engagement in the learning process.Time Point: Right after the intervention.Overall Study Time Frame: 6 months.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
tygh backup
Taoyuan General Hospital
Taoyuan General Hospital