Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06983535
NCT06983535TerminatedNot Applicable

Induction of Labor (IOL) Using Cervical Double-balloon (Cook Catheter) in Outpatient Versus Inpatient Setting (COOK Study): a Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial.

Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg4 sites in 1 country358 target enrollmentStarted: August 15, 2016Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Terminated
Sponsor
Enrollment
358
Locations
4
Primary Endpoint
Fetal wellbeing

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Why was this study done? About 20-30% of pregnancies involve labor being started artificially, known as induction. One way to do this is with a balloon catheter placed in the cervix, which helps prepare the body for labor. This mechanical method works just as well as using medication but may be safer for the baby, as it reduces the chances of the womb contracting too much (which can cause stress to the baby). Because it's safe and simple, this method could possibly be done at home instead of in the hospital.

What was the aim of the study? The researchers wanted to compare how safe and effective this balloon method is when used at home (outpatient) versus in the hospital (inpatient). They also wanted to know how satisfied women were with each approach.

How was the study done? The study took place at four hospitals in Belgium between 2017 and 2023. It included women with healthy low risk pregnancies who were scheduled for induction for non-urgent reasons, such as being past their due date, having a large baby, or by personal choice after 38 weeks of pregnancy.

The women were randomly placed into two groups:

Outpatient setting: going home after balloon placement.

Inpatient setting: staying in the hospital after balloon placement<

The main thing researchers measured was whether the baby's heart rate pattern (checked by CTG monitoring) was abnormal after 12 hours. They also looked at how the baby was born (vaginal birth or C-section), how long labor took, whether additional medicine was needed, pain management, and how satisfied the mothers were with the process.

Detailed Description

Study Design and Approval

This was a randomised controlled trial - a scientific study designed to compare two groups as fairly as possible. It took place in four hospitals in Belgium:

Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (ZOL), Genk

AZ Sint-Lucas, Brugge

Jessa Ziekenhuis, Hasselt

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •women >18 years of age with singleton pregnancies, cephalic presentation and a unfavourable cervix requiring priming (Bishop Score ≤ 6) that needed an IOL for low risk indications: post-term, macrosomia, patient's preference (> 38 0/7 weeks of gestational age).

Exclusion Criteria

  • •: multiple pregnancies, preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM), foetal growth restriction (FGR), placenta-accreta spectrum (PAS), previous C-Section(s), non-cephalic presentation, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, living at >60 minutes from the hospital, any other maternal or foetal morbidity, any other contraindication to vaginal birth.

Arms & Interventions

Inpatient

Active Comparator

Patient in this arm were randomized to stay in the hospital during cervical balloon ripening

Intervention: cervical balloon catheter (Device)

Outpatient

Active Comparator

Patients in this arm were randomized to ambulant home setting during cervical ripening

Intervention: cervical balloon catheter (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Fetal wellbeing

Time Frame: 12 hours

The primary outcome was foetal wellbeing assessed by cardiotocography (CTG) immediately after balloon insertion and balloon removal (12 hours after insertion). The CTG could be normal or not normal. The CTG was reported as not normal in case of a baseline rise, decelerations (even if they were not repeated decelerations) or decreased variability. The second CTG assessment was performed earlier in case of vaginal bleeding, fluid loss, onset of regular painful contractions, balloon expulsion or in any other case judged clinically relevant by the obstetrician

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (4)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials