MedPath

PRospective Evaluation Complementing Investigation With Acurate Neo Device

Completed
Conditions
Aortic Stenosis
Registration Number
NCT03846557
Lead Sponsor
Fundación EPIC
Brief Summary

The study collects real-world data of patients who were treated with the Acurate Neo TAVI System and evaluates early and midterm clinical outcomes.

Detailed Description

The study collects real-world data of patients who were treated with the Acurate Neo TAVI System and evaluates early and midterm clinical outcomes.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
300
Inclusion Criteria
  • ≥18 years.
  • Severe aortic stenosis with indication of implantation of aortic valve prosthesis in which an Acurate Neo device is implanted according to the indications for use.
  • Has signed the Patient Informed Consent Form.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Severe aortic stenosis without indication of implantation of aortic valve prosthesis in which an Acurate Neo device is implanted according to the indications for use.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Device success of implantation7 days

Proportion of patients with device success of implantation defined as:

* absence of procedural mortality AND

* correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location AND

* no prosthesis - patient mismatch AND

* mean aortic valve gradient \<20 mmHg, AND

* no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation

Cardiovascular death30 days post-index procedure

Cumulative incidence of a combination of all cause Cardiovascular death

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assessment of early safety30 days

Proportion of patients with early safety defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) as:

* All-cause mortality

* All stroke (disabling and non-disabling)

* Life-threatening bleeding

* Acute kidney injury-Stage 2 or 3 (including renal replacement therapy)

* Coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention

* Major vascular complication

* Valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure

Assessment of time-related valve safety30 days

Proportion of patients with structural valve deterioration as defined by:

* Requiring repeat procedure (transcatheter or surgical heart valve replacement)

* Valve-related dysfunction defined by

* mean aortic valve gradient ≥20 mmHg and

* no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation

* Prosthetic valve endocarditis

* Prosthetic valve thrombosis

* Thrombo-embolic events (e.g. stroke)

* VARC bleeding, unless clearly unrelated to valve therapy

Assesment of NYHA (New York Heart Association ) classification7 days, 30 days, 12 month

Assesment of NYHA classification

Assessment of mean aortic gradient post-implantationup to one year

Assessment of mean aortic gradient post-implantation

Death during the hospitalization of the patientdate of procedure till date of estimated discharge, assessed up to two weeks

Proportion of patients with death during the hospitalization designated by the VARC-2 criteria

Trial Locations

Locations (10)

Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol

🇪🇸

Badalona, Barcelona, Spain

Hospital Universitari Vall D'Hebron

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Spain

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Spain

Hospital Universitario de Burgos

🇪🇸

Burgos, Spain

Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves

🇪🇸

Granada, Spain

Hospital Universitario Ramon Y Cajal

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

Hospital Clinico de San Carlos

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

Hospital Universitario de La Paz

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

Hospital Universitari I Politècnic de La Fé

🇪🇸

Valencia, Spain

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid

🇪🇸

Valladolid, Spain

Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol
🇪🇸Badalona, Barcelona, Spain

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.