PRospective Evaluation Complementing Investigation With Acurate Neo Device
- Conditions
- Aortic Stenosis
- Registration Number
- NCT03846557
- Lead Sponsor
- Fundación EPIC
- Brief Summary
The study collects real-world data of patients who were treated with the Acurate Neo TAVI System and evaluates early and midterm clinical outcomes.
- Detailed Description
The study collects real-world data of patients who were treated with the Acurate Neo TAVI System and evaluates early and midterm clinical outcomes.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 300
- ≥18 years.
- Severe aortic stenosis with indication of implantation of aortic valve prosthesis in which an Acurate Neo device is implanted according to the indications for use.
- Has signed the Patient Informed Consent Form.
- Severe aortic stenosis without indication of implantation of aortic valve prosthesis in which an Acurate Neo device is implanted according to the indications for use.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Device success of implantation 7 days Proportion of patients with device success of implantation defined as:
* absence of procedural mortality AND
* correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location AND
* no prosthesis - patient mismatch AND
* mean aortic valve gradient \<20 mmHg, AND
* no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitationCardiovascular death 30 days post-index procedure Cumulative incidence of a combination of all cause Cardiovascular death
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assessment of early safety 30 days Proportion of patients with early safety defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) as:
* All-cause mortality
* All stroke (disabling and non-disabling)
* Life-threatening bleeding
* Acute kidney injury-Stage 2 or 3 (including renal replacement therapy)
* Coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention
* Major vascular complication
* Valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedureAssessment of time-related valve safety 30 days Proportion of patients with structural valve deterioration as defined by:
* Requiring repeat procedure (transcatheter or surgical heart valve replacement)
* Valve-related dysfunction defined by
* mean aortic valve gradient ≥20 mmHg and
* no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation
* Prosthetic valve endocarditis
* Prosthetic valve thrombosis
* Thrombo-embolic events (e.g. stroke)
* VARC bleeding, unless clearly unrelated to valve therapyAssesment of NYHA (New York Heart Association ) classification 7 days, 30 days, 12 month Assesment of NYHA classification
Assessment of mean aortic gradient post-implantation up to one year Assessment of mean aortic gradient post-implantation
Death during the hospitalization of the patient date of procedure till date of estimated discharge, assessed up to two weeks Proportion of patients with death during the hospitalization designated by the VARC-2 criteria
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (10)
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol
🇪🇸Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitari Vall D'Hebron
🇪🇸Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
🇪🇸Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Burgos
🇪🇸Burgos, Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves
🇪🇸Granada, Spain
Hospital Universitario Ramon Y Cajal
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
Hospital Clinico de San Carlos
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitario de La Paz
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitari I Politècnic de La Fé
🇪🇸Valencia, Spain
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid
🇪🇸Valladolid, Spain
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol🇪🇸Badalona, Barcelona, Spain