Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06254378
NCT06254378Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Allograft Versus Tenting Technique in Open Sinus Lifting With Immediate Implant Placement A Randomized Clinical Trial

Cairo University0 sites20 target enrollmentStarted: March 1, 2024Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Enrollment
20
Primary Endpoint
Implant stability

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Implant placement in deficient posterior maxilla is a challenging clinical situation that necessitates appropriate treatment options to restore this area.

-Aim of the study: To compare allograft vs tenting technique in terms of implant stability and bone height.

Detailed Description

Rationale for carrying out the trial:

The research population will be divided into two groups. Group1 will be treated by allograft with immediate implant technique, Group2 will be treated by tenting technique with immediate implant technique. Allograft has been effective in augmenting bone growth and has been proven to be a vital asset in sinus lifting.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
30 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patient with missing upper pre molar , molar teeth
  • •Patients in need of bone grafting of the maxillary sinus to house an implant.
  • •Patients with residual alveolar crest of at least 3-4mm in height and 5mm in width distal to the canine as measured on CBCT scan
  • •Patients with adequate inter-arch space

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients suffering from any sinus pathosis.
  • •Patients who are heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes/day).
  • •Patient under psychiatric therapy or unrealistic expectations
  • •Patients of systemic conditions that may interfere with carrying out the surgical procedure.
  • •Lack of opposite occluding dentition/prosthesis in the area intended for implant placement
  • •Severe bruxism or clenching
  • •Poor oral hygiene (full mouth bleeding on probing and full mouth plaque index >25%)

Arms & Interventions

Sinus lifting without graft (control )

Active Comparator

Patients will receive sinus lifting with immediate implant placement without graft placement.

Intervention: Sinus lifting without graft (Other)

Sinus lifting with graft (intervention)

Experimental

Patients will receive sinus lifting with immediate implant and allograft placement.

Intervention: Sinus lifting with allograft (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Implant stability

Time Frame: During the implant placement procedure and after 6 months

implant stability quotient(ISQ) is the evaluation unit set to determine the correct isq\<60:low stability isq 60-65 : medium stability isq \>70: high stability stability of the implant, this module by means of a resonance frequency analysis (rfa) applied to the bone manages to measure stability on an isq scale from 1 to 100 (khz):

Secondary Outcomes

  • Bone hight(Before surgery and after 6 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Amira Raafat Ahmed Elshikh

Dentist

Cairo University

Similar Trials