Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab in Pediatric Participants With Episodic Migraine
- Conditions
- Migraine
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT03836040
- Lead Sponsor
- Amgen
- Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of erenumab in migraine prevention in children (6 to \<12 years) and adolescents (12 to \<18 years) with episodic migraine. The study hypothesis is that in pediatric participants with episodic migraine, the combined erenumab dose group has a greater reduction from baseline to week 9 through week 12 (month 3) in monthly migraine days (MMDs) when compared with placebo in the double-blind treatment phase (DBTP).
- Detailed Description
This study is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of erenumab in migraine prevention in children (6 to \<12 years) and adolescents (12 to \<18 years) with episodic migraine.
The trial consists of four phases: screening (up to 3 weeks of initial screening and a 4-week prospective baseline phase); the DBTP (24 weeks for Group 1 participants; 12-weeks for Group 2 participants) in which participants receive placebo or Erenumab dose 1, dose 2 or dose 3 (based on participant's body weight) via subcutaneous injection once a month; the optional dose level blinded extension phase (40 weeks), in which all participants are assigned to receive dose 1, dose 2 or dose 3 of Erenumab; and a 12 weeks safety follow-up phase (16 weeks after the last dose of investigational drug).
The study intends to enroll 436 participants (376 adolescents and up to 60 children).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 436
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Dose level 1 Erenumab Dose 1 Participants will be randomized to one of two doses determined by their body weight at Day 1. Participants who enrolled under the original protocol or protocol amendment 1 will be identified as group 1. Those enrolled under protocol amendment 2 will be identified as group 2. Dose level 1 Erenumab Dose 2 Participants will be randomized to one of two doses determined by their body weight at Day 1. Participants who enrolled under the original protocol or protocol amendment 1 will be identified as group 1. Those enrolled under protocol amendment 2 will be identified as group 2. Dose level 2 Erenumab Dose 3 Participants will be randomized to one of two doses determined by their body weight at Day 1. Participants who enrolled under the original protocol or protocol amendment 1 will be identified as group 1. Those enrolled under protocol amendment 2 will be identified as group 2. Dose level 2 Erenumab Dose 2 Participants will be randomized to one of two doses determined by their body weight at Day 1. Participants who enrolled under the original protocol or protocol amendment 1 will be identified as group 1. Those enrolled under protocol amendment 2 will be identified as group 2. Placebo Placebo Participants will be randomized to a placebo comparator.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline in MMDs Baseline through week 12 of the double blind treatment phase To evaluate the effect of erenumab compared with placebo on the change in MMDs from baseline to week 9 through week 12 (month 3) of the double-blind treatment period (DBTP).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in monthly headache days from baseline Baseline through week 12 of the double blind treatment phase To evaluate the effect of erenumab compared with placebo on the change from baseline in monthly headache days to week 9 through week 12 (month 3) of the DBTP
Proportion of participants with at least 50% reduction in MMDs from baseline Baseline through week 12 of the double blind treatment phase To evaluate the effect of erenumab compared with placebo on the proportion of participants with at least 50% reduction in MMDs from baseline to week 9 through week 12 (month 3) of the DBTP
Change in MMDs from baseline to the average of the first 3 months Baseline through week 12 of the double blind treatment phase To evaluate the effect of erenumab compared with placebo on the change in MMDs from baseline to the average of the first 3 months (week 1 through week 12) of the DBTP
Change in monthly average severity of migraine attacks from baseline (measured with a visual analogue scale) Baseline through week 12 of the double blind treatment phase To evaluate the effect of erenumab compared with placebo on the change from baseline in monthly average severity of migraine attacks to week 9 through week 12 (month 3) of the DBTP. This will be measured in a daily electronic diary (eDiary) with a visual analogue scale.
Change from baseline in migraine-related disability and productivity Baseline through week 12 of the double blind treatment phase To evaluate the effect of erenumab compared with placebo on the change from baseline in migraine-related disability and productivity as measured by the modified PedMIDAS to week 9 through week 12 (month 3) of the DBTP.
Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Up to week 80 Any clinically significant changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms, and clinical laboratory tests that occurred after study treatment administration will be recorded as TEAEs.
Number of Participants Expressing C Terminal Telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (CTX) Markers Up to week 64 Number of Participants Expressing Procollagen Type 1 N Propeptide (P1NP) Markers Up to week 64 Number of Participants Expressing Anti-erenumab Antibodies Up to week 80 Change in Growth and Development Rate as Assessed by Physical Measurements Based on Age-adjusted Z-scores for Height and Weight Up to week 80 Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation and Behavior as Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Up to week 64 Group 1 Only: Number of Participants Experiencing Injection Site Pain as Assessed by Face Pain Scale-revised (FPS-R) Day 1 and week 20 Group 2 Only: Number of Participants Experiencing Injection Site Pain as Assessed by FPS-R Day 1 and week 8
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (119)
Paradigm Clinical Research Center Inc
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
Childrens Hospital Colorado
🇺🇸Aurora, Colorado, United States
Colorado Springs Neurological Associates
🇺🇸Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
New England Institute for Clinical Research
🇺🇸Stamford, Connecticut, United States
Childrens National Health System
🇺🇸Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Northwest Florida Clinical Research Group Limited Liability Company
🇺🇸Gulf Breeze, Florida, United States
Nicklaus Childrens Hospital
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
Pediatric Epilepsy and Neurology Specialists
🇺🇸Tampa, Florida, United States
TrueBlue Clinical Research
🇺🇸Tampa, Florida, United States
Premiere Research Institute
🇺🇸West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Scroll for more (109 remaining)Paradigm Clinical Research Center Inc🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States