Comparison of Intravitreal Bevacizumab and Triamcinolone Acetonide With Intravitreal Bevacizumab Alone in Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Group A
- Conditions
- Central Retinal Vein Occlusion With Macular Edema
- Sponsor
- Hayatabad Medical Complex
- Enrollment
- 30
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Visual Acuity
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
To compare the effect of intravitreal-Bevacizumab and Triamcinolone with intravitreal-Bevacizumab alone on visual acuity and central foveal thickness in patients with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.
Investigators
Yousaf Jamal Mahsood
Dr.
Hayatabad Medical Complex
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Subjects of either gender, age 40-80 years, having macular edema secondary to CRVO, Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of less than or equal to 0.3 on Log MAR chart (Snellen equivalent of 6/12), Central foveal thickness CFT greater than or equal to 250 microns on Heidelberg Spectralis Spectral Domain Optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and clinical diagnosis of CRVO.
Exclusion Criteria
- •previously received laser treatment and/or intravitreal injection of any Anti-VEGF agent, having one eye, diagnosed case of glaucoma, family history of glaucoma, young patient, and anyone who has received any treatment for CRVO before presenting to us.
Arms & Interventions
Group A
A single injection of triamcinolone acetonide (Kenacort-AⓇ). (2mg/0.05ml) and intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin®) (1.25mg/0.05ml) was given at the start of the treatment whereas intravitreal bevacizumab (1.25mg/0.05ml) was repeated monthly for 3 months.
Intervention: Group A
Group B
Intravitreal bevacizumab (1.25mg/0.05ml) was repeated monthly for 3 months.
Intervention: Group A
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Visual Acuity
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in visual acuity
Secondary Outcomes
- Central Foveal Thickness(Baseline and 6 months)