Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07483957
NCT07483957CompletedNot Applicable

Linear vs. Circular Stapled Gastrojejunal Anastomosis in Bariatric Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery in Switzerland: A Retrospective National Registry Study From 2015 to 2022.

Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen1 site in 1 country21,375 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2015Last updated:

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
21,375
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Overall complications

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Bariatric surgery has become one of the preferred options in treatment of severe obesity and its comorbidities in the Western world. In Switzerland, the approximate 5000 annual bariatric operations are performed exclusively in centres certified by the "Swiss Society of Study of Morbid Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (SMOB)". Among the different bariatric surgical procedures, the laparoscopic gastric bypass remains one of the most frequently performed operations. A critical step of this operation is the creation of the gastrojejunal anastomosis. This can be done using either a linear or a circular stapler. The optimal method continues to be discussed in current academic research. The linear anastomosis technique seems to be more feasible, uses smaller incisions and is therefore faster performed. The circular anastomosis technique benefits from a standardised diameter of the anastomosis with consecutive higher reproducibility. No difference in long-term weight loss have been described for these two techniques until today. The linear technique has been linked to marginal ulcers, while the circular technique has been associated with higher rates of stenosis and incisional hernia. The associations with other long-term adverse events such as internal hernias remain under discussion. However, according to several international analyses, the linear technique seems to have favourable short-term outcomes with shorter operation time and lower rates of wound complications and postoperative bleeding. Both techniques are used in Switzerland but Swiss national data on this topic is scarce. Given the high annual case volume of bariatric surgery in Switzerland and the inconsistent international evidence, a systematic comparison of these two techniques is of relevance.

This retrospective registry study provides Swiss national data on short-term postoperative outcomes after elective laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass from 2015 to 2022. It aims to compare the linear vs. circular gastrojejunal anastomosis in terms of postoperative short-term postoperative, reoperation rate, and length of hospital stay.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Elective laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Exclusion Criteria

  • Incomplete documentation
  • Age under 20 years
  • Other hospitals than general or surgical hospitals
  • Omega-loop gastric bypass
  • Emergency admission
  • No stapler coded
  • Open access

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Overall complications

Time Frame: Periprocedural

Secondary Outcomes

  • Time trend age(Between 2015 and 2022)
  • Time trend CCI(Between 2015 and 2022)
  • Individual complications(Periprocedural)
  • Reoperation(Periprocedural)
  • Time trend insurance(Between 2015 and 2022)
  • Time trend access(Between 2015 and 2022)
  • Length of hospital stay(up to 4 weeks)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Yanic Ammann

Principal investigator

Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Linear vs. Circular Stapled Gastrojejunal... | Clinical Trial