跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07483957
NCT07483957已完成不适用

Linear vs. Circular Stapled Gastrojejunal Anastomosis in Bariatric Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery in Switzerland: A Retrospective National Registry Study From 2015 to 2022.

Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 21,375 人开始时间: 2015年1月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
21,375
试验地点
1
主要终点
Overall complications

研究概览

简要总结

Bariatric surgery has become one of the preferred options in treatment of severe obesity and its comorbidities in the Western world. In Switzerland, the approximate 5000 annual bariatric operations are performed exclusively in centres certified by the "Swiss Society of Study of Morbid Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (SMOB)". Among the different bariatric surgical procedures, the laparoscopic gastric bypass remains one of the most frequently performed operations. A critical step of this operation is the creation of the gastrojejunal anastomosis. This can be done using either a linear or a circular stapler. The optimal method continues to be discussed in current academic research. The linear anastomosis technique seems to be more feasible, uses smaller incisions and is therefore faster performed. The circular anastomosis technique benefits from a standardised diameter of the anastomosis with consecutive higher reproducibility. No difference in long-term weight loss have been described for these two techniques until today. The linear technique has been linked to marginal ulcers, while the circular technique has been associated with higher rates of stenosis and incisional hernia. The associations with other long-term adverse events such as internal hernias remain under discussion. However, according to several international analyses, the linear technique seems to have favourable short-term outcomes with shorter operation time and lower rates of wound complications and postoperative bleeding. Both techniques are used in Switzerland but Swiss national data on this topic is scarce. Given the high annual case volume of bariatric surgery in Switzerland and the inconsistent international evidence, a systematic comparison of these two techniques is of relevance.

This retrospective registry study provides Swiss national data on short-term postoperative outcomes after elective laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass from 2015 to 2022. It aims to compare the linear vs. circular gastrojejunal anastomosis in terms of postoperative short-term postoperative, reoperation rate, and length of hospital stay.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Elective laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

排除标准

  • Incomplete documentation
  • Age under 20 years
  • Other hospitals than general or surgical hospitals
  • Omega-loop gastric bypass
  • Emergency admission
  • No stapler coded
  • Open access

结局指标

主要结局

Overall complications

时间窗: Periprocedural

次要结局

  • Time trend age(Between 2015 and 2022)
  • Time trend CCI(Between 2015 and 2022)
  • Individual complications(Periprocedural)
  • Reoperation(Periprocedural)
  • Time trend insurance(Between 2015 and 2022)
  • Time trend access(Between 2015 and 2022)
  • Length of hospital stay(up to 4 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Yanic Ammann

Principal investigator

Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验