Orthotic Management of CMC Osteoarthritis
- Conditions
- Arthritis Wrist
- Interventions
- Device: Orthosis fabricationDevice: Thermal Sensor Monitoring of Orthosis UseDiagnostic Test: 4D CT Scan
- Registration Number
- NCT04297943
- Lead Sponsor
- Western University, Canada
- Brief Summary
This study will investigate the effectiveness of 3D printed splints for the treatment of thumb osteoarthritis (CMC OA). Currently, these splints are made by Occupational Therapists and Physical Therapists out of low temperature plastic, and formed on the patient's hand. 3D printed splints involve taking a photographic scan of the hand and creating a digital file of the splint. This is then printed and fit on the patient. This study will compare the effectiveness of these methods of splint fabrication. Our outcomes will include measurements of pain relief, adherence, patient satisfaction, muscle contraction and CT imaging during pinch tasks to measure the ability of these splint types to support the CMC joint.
- Detailed Description
This study will be prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Patients will be identified for potential inclusion by the surgeons at HULC. The standard of clinical care is for diagnosis of CMC is to perform X-rays of the hand and this is done routinely. Based on these images and clinical evaluation, surgeons will establish a diagnosis of CMC, and provide a grading of severity based on the Eaton/Littler Classification on a referral pad. Eligible participants will then be asked to attend the Clinical Research Laboratory within HULC, where one of the co-investigators listed will present the letter of information and obtain informed consent. Patients who agree to participate will be asked to complete 3 functional outcomes questionnaires (i.e. DASH, PRWHE, and VAS pain scale). Bilateral wrist and thumb range of motion, lateral and tripod pinch strength, and grip strength will also be assessed.
Following the initial assessment, patients will be randomized into one of two groups. Patients will be stratified based on their initial referral by the hand surgeon according to CMC OA severity results to ensure that equal numbers of participants fall into each treatment arm based on the Eaton Classification of their CMC OA. After randomization, patients will attend splinting visit #1 (based on scheduling availability) either the Hand Therapy Department at St. Joseph's Health Care London or Hand Therapy Canada, a private clinic in London. Regardless of group allocation or location of therapy visit, patients will not be charged for their therapy visits or for their splint.
Splinting Visit #1
Group one will be fit with a low temperature custom thermoplastic brace at one of the aforementioned clinic locations and then booked for a follow up appointment in the clinical research laboratory at SJHC two weeks later.
Group two will have their hand placed in a scanner that takes multiple photographs of the hand and reconstructs these photos into a single 3 dimensional computer image. From there, one of the co-investigators (MS) will "draw" the splint, and send to a 3D printer. Patients will come back to a clinic location for fitting, and will then follow up 2 weeks after splint fitting at the clinical research laboratory 2 weeks later.
Regardless of group allocation, each splint will have a temperature sensor placed into the splint. This sensor is similar to a watch battery and collects and records several thousand temperature readings on pre-set intervals. Participants will be told that the the sensor records data on position of the hand in space, but in fact, recording the temperature will provide information about adherence with the splinting program.
CT Scan
Patients undergo a 4D CT scan of bilateral thumb CMC joints. This will include scans at rest, while performing lateral pinch of 2kg, 5kg, and maximum pinch (if greater than 5kg). They will then apply their splint, and these images will be repeated while wearing the splint.
Follow Up Visits
Participants will be asked to wear their splint during most functional activities for 8 weeks, with the goal of wearing their splint for at least half of their waking hours. They will be asked to keep a daily logbook of the amount of time spent in the splint and will keep these records until the 2-month visit. All participants will return to therapy once every 2 weeks. The purpose of these follow up visits will be to download the data from the temperature sensors and to ensure there is no skin irritation or evidence of any skin breakdown from splint use.
2-month visit
At 2 months, participants will be asked to repeat the three functional outcomes questionnaires and will have their ROM and strength re-tested as in visit #1. They will also have a surface EMG recording of their muscle contractions while in the splint. At this point, the sensors will be removed from the splints for final analysis. Patients will also turn in their logbooks of splint usage, and complete a splinting satisfaction questionnaire. They will then attend a second visit to the CT scanner for a repeat imaging session exactly as listed above.
Final Visit
Participants will be call back to the clinic for a final evaluation at 12 months. At this point, all measures will be repeated with the exception of the CT scans.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 68
All patients with a diagnosis of CMC OA
Language barriers Cognitive barriers Previous thumb metacarpal fracture Advanced scapho-trapezial OA
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Custom Thermoplastic Orthosis Orthosis fabrication See summary Custom Thermoplastic Orthosis 4D CT Scan See summary 3D Orthosis 4D CT Scan See summary Custom Thermoplastic Orthosis Thermal Sensor Monitoring of Orthosis Use See summary 3D Orthosis Orthosis fabrication See summary 3D Orthosis Thermal Sensor Monitoring of Orthosis Use See summary
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire. Initial Visit, at 2 month visit, and at 1 year Patient reported outcome measure
Change in Pain Initial Visit, at 2 month visit, and at 1 year VAS scale for pain
4D CT Scan Changes At enrolment and again 2 months later Effectiveness of Orthosis to stabilize CMC while pinching
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Adherence Measured at 2 month visit, with data downloaded biweekly Measured via log book and temperature sensors
Orthosis Satisfaction Survey At 2 month visit and at 1 year Assessment of participants satisfaction with orthosis
Change in Pinch strength Measured in CT scans at enrolment and at 2 month visit Pinch gauge measurements