Intravenous Versus Oral Treatment of the Main Acute Infections in Emergency Departments
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 4,000
- 试验地点
- 7
- 主要终点
- Days alive outside hospital (Efficacy)
研究概览
简要总结
Patients admitted to the hospital with acute infections are often treated with intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Around 70% of these infections fall into three categories: respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, and cellulitis. A Danish study found that 76% of patients admitted with suspected community-acquired pneumonia and treated with antibiotics received them intravenously. Based on an extrapolated estimate from an unpublished local survey, approximately 50,000 patients in Denmark are admitted each year for infections and treated with IV antibiotics. The average hospital stay for these patients is 5.9 days, resulting in a total of 295,000 hospital days annually, accounting for about 7% of total hospital admissions in Denmark. This represents an annual cost of 2.3 billion DKK. While some patients need hospitalization due to their overall health or other serious conditions, others remain hospitalized primarily to receive IV antibiotics.
Expanding the use of oral antibiotics in emergency departments should be pursued only if it can demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety to IV administration. Therefore this study will investigate the efficiency of primarily oral antibiotics in acutely admitted patients with proven or suspected infections. Additionally, the investigators will evaluate the safety of oral regimen for these patients.
详细描述
Patients admitted to the hospital with infections are often treated with intravenous antibiotics. The rationale for using intravenous antibiotics includes eliminating the risk of reduced absorption, achieving higher serum concentrations, and the fact that many broad-spectrum antibiotics (such as cephalosporins and carbapenems) are not available in oral form. However, intravenous antibiotics also have drawbacks, such as the risk of catheter-related infections, challenges in home-based treatment, and difficulty switching to oral antibiotics unless microbiological results are definitively positive. Prolonged hospital stays associated with intravenous antibiotic treatment lead to economic burdens, increased risk of hospital-acquired infections, and significant functional decline, especially in older patients.
In recent decades, many studies have explored the possibility of fully or partially replacing intravenous antibiotics with oral antibiotics for certain infections.
In this study, the investigators will examine the safety and efficacy of primarily oral antibiotic regimens in patients with confirmed or suspected infections admitted to the emergency department. The study is an open-label, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either standard intravenous antibiotic treatment according to Danish guidelines or oral antibiotic treatment based on tailored recommendations developed by microbiologists and infectious disease specialists at participating sites, in accordance with local guidelines.
The study has two primary outcomes: 1) Efficacy-measured as the number of days alive outside the hospital within 30 days after randomization, and 2) Safety-measured by mortality or the need for vasopressors within 30 days after randomization. A total of 4,000 patients will be needed to address both primary outcomes.
Aim: The trial aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of oral antibiotic administration compared to intravenous antibiotic administration in patients referred to the emergency department with suspected or diagnosed bacterial pneumonia, urinary tract infection and cellulitis.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Suspected respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, or cellulitis by the attending physician
- •Planned or initiated intravenous antibiotic treatment
排除标准
- •if received more than two doses of intravenous antibiotics;
- •systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg;
- •nausea and/or vomiting in more than one short-term instance during the last 2 days;
- •suspected significantly reduced gastrointestinal absorption;
- •confirmed plasma-lactate > 2;
- •pregnant or nursing;
- •unable to give informed consent;
- •severe immunodeficiency;
- •urgent vital treatment needed.
研究组 & 干预措施
Standard Care
Standard intravenous treatment in accordance with local or national procedures
Oral treatment
Oral treatment
干预措施: Oral treatment (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Days alive outside hospital (Efficacy)
时间窗: From randomization date to 30 days
The number of days the patients are alive outside hospital within 30 days after randomization
Number of patients requiring treatment with vasopressors
时间窗: From date of randomization to 30 days
Number of patients that die or number of patients that require treatment with vasopressors within 30 days after randomization
次要结局
- 90-days mortality(Up to 90 days from baseline (randomization date))
- Length of hospital stay(From date of randomization until date of documented hospital discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 months)
- Inhospital mortality(From date of randomization until date of death in hospital from any cause, assessed up to 6 months)
- 30-days mortality(up to 30 days from baseline (randomization date))
- One-year mortality(Up to one-year from baseline (randomization date))
- Five-year mortality(Up to five-years from baseline (randomization date))
- Discharge within 24 hours(Up to 24 hours after rom baseline (randomization date))
- Readmission(30 days after discharge date)
- Intensive care admission(From date of randomization until date of admission to intensive care during hospitalization due to any cause, assessed up to 6 months)
- Days on antibiotic treatment within 30 days(Within 30 days from randomization date)
- Bacteremia(Day 7 to day 30 from randomization date)