Hyrax Vs. Invisalign Palatal Expander Clinical Study
- Conditions
- MalocclusionsNarrow MaxillaNarrow Maxillary ArchCrowding
- Registration Number
- NCT06662279
- Lead Sponsor
- Align Technology, Inc.
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare expansion result and the overall experience between the Invisalign Palatal Expander and the Hyrax expander.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 36
- Subject ages 6-11 years old
- Subject must need maxillary expansion
- Subjects must have erupted dentition in the area of the primary molars or permanent premolars and the first permanent molar
- Subjects with palatal exostosis/surface aberration/ cleft palate
- Subject's dentition not compatible with device or allergy to device materials
- Subject with active caries, periodontal disease, TMD
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method width of palate after expansion from enrollment to study completion, approximately 4 months intraoral scans will be taken of the subject's upper arch, including palate throughout the study and widths will be measured
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (4)
Innovative Orthodontic Centers
🇺🇸Naperville, Illinois, United States
The Orthodontic Studio
🇺🇸Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States
Orange Coast Orthodontics
🇺🇸Laguna Hills, California, United States
Spillers Orthodontics
🇺🇸Warner Robins, Georgia, United States