MedPath

Hyrax Vs. Invisalign Palatal Expander Clinical Study

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Malocclusions
Narrow Maxilla
Narrow Maxillary Arch
Crowding
Registration Number
NCT06662279
Lead Sponsor
Align Technology, Inc.
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare expansion result and the overall experience between the Invisalign Palatal Expander and the Hyrax expander.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
36
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subject ages 6-11 years old
  • Subject must need maxillary expansion
  • Subjects must have erupted dentition in the area of the primary molars or permanent premolars and the first permanent molar
Exclusion Criteria
  • Subjects with palatal exostosis/surface aberration/ cleft palate
  • Subject's dentition not compatible with device or allergy to device materials
  • Subject with active caries, periodontal disease, TMD

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
width of palate after expansionfrom enrollment to study completion, approximately 4 months

intraoral scans will be taken of the subject's upper arch, including palate throughout the study and widths will be measured

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

Innovative Orthodontic Centers

🇺🇸

Naperville, Illinois, United States

The Orthodontic Studio

🇺🇸

Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States

Orange Coast Orthodontics

🇺🇸

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Spillers Orthodontics

🇺🇸

Warner Robins, Georgia, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath