MedPath

Comparison of Prohance® With Gadovist®/Gadavist™ in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Brain

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Brain Disease
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01613417
Lead Sponsor
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc
Brief Summary

This study aims at a direct comparison between ProHance (0.1 mmol/kg) and a validated comparator Gadovist/Gadavist (0.1 mmol/kg) in a crossover intra-individual design in subjects with brain tumors to confirm the identical overall technical and diagnostic performance of the two MR contrast agents.

Detailed Description

Adult patients were given two MRI exams, one after injection of ProHance (0.1 mmol/kg) and one after injection of Gadovist/Gadavist (0.1 mmol/kg). The exams were performed with identical equipment and imaging parameters with the order of the two exams randomized and 2-14 days between the first and the second MRI exam. Image data was evaluated by 3 expert neuroradiologist blinded to the agent administered and patient clinical data.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
229
Inclusion Criteria
  • Are scheduled to undergo MRI
  • Are willing to undergo two MRI procedures within 14 days
  • Have confirmed or are highly suspected of brain disease likely to enhance as determined by the following:
  • Clinical/neurological symptomatology;
  • Diagnostic testing, such as CT or previous MRI examinations; or
  • Have had previous brain surgery and are to be evaluated for recurrence.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Are pregnant or lactating females. Exclude the possibility of pregnancy:
  • by testing on site at the institution within 24 hours prior to the start of each investigational product administration; or
  • by history (i.e., tubal ligation or hysterectomy); or
  • post menopausal with a minimum of 1 year without menses
  • Have any known allergy to one or more of the ingredients in the investigational products, or have a history of hypersensitivity to any metals
  • Have congestive heart failure (class IV according to the classification of the New York Heart Association; see Appendix A)
  • Have suffered a stroke within a year
  • Have received or are scheduled to receive any other contrast medium in the 24 hours preceding through the 24 hours following Exam 1, and in the 24 hours preceding through the 24 hours following Exam 2
  • Have received or are scheduled to receive an investigational compound and/or medical device within 30 days before admission into the present study, through the 24 hours post-administration of the second investigational product.
  • Have moderate-to-severe renal impairment, defined as a GFR/eGFR < 45 mL/min.
  • Have been previously entered into this study
  • Have received or are scheduled for one of the following:
  • Surgery within three weeks prior to the first examination or between the two examinations
  • Initiation of steroid therapy between the two examinations
  • Radiosurgery between the two examinations
  • Have any contraindications to MRI such as a pace-maker, magnetic material (i.e., surgical clips) or any other conditions that would preclude proximity to a strong magnetic field.
  • Are suffering from severe claustrophobia

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MRI with GadobutrolgadobutrolMRI after 0.1 mmol/kg IV Gadovist/Gadavist, then with 0.1 mmol/kg ProHance. MRI performed after both agents with identical sequences.
MRI with GadoteridolgadoteridolMRI after 0.1 mmol/kg IV ProHance, then with 0.1 mmol/kg Gadovist/Gadavist. MRI performed after both agents with identical sequences.
MRI with GadoteridolgadobutrolMRI after 0.1 mmol/kg IV ProHance, then with 0.1 mmol/kg Gadovist/Gadavist. MRI performed after both agents with identical sequences.
MRI with GadobutrolgadoteridolMRI after 0.1 mmol/kg IV Gadovist/Gadavist, then with 0.1 mmol/kg ProHance. MRI performed after both agents with identical sequences.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Global Diagnostic Preference Between the Two ExamsComparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days

Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Lesion Detection5-10 minutes Postdose

Lesion detection rate by contrast agent and reader

Extent of DiseaseComparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days

Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.

Percentage Signal Intensity Enhancement on Postdose Images5-10 minutes Postdose

Mean difference in percentage signal intensity enhancement on postdose T1-weighted SE/FSE images (ProHance - Gadovist/Gadavist)

Lesion Border DelineationComparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days

Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.

Lesion Contrast EnhancementComparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days

Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.

Lesion to Background Ratio on Post T1-weighed Spin Echo Images5-10 minutes Postdose

Mean of difference in signal intensity postdose (ProHance - Gadovist/Gadavist)

Lesion Internal MorphologyComparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days

Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.

Accuracy for Tumor Characterization5-10 minutes Postdose

Blinded reader assessment of accuracy of tumor characterization (benign/malignant) - patient level assessment

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Holy Name Medical Center

🇺🇸

Teaneck, New Jersey, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath