Effect of Intraarticular Ozone, Prolotherapy or Dexmedetomidine in Pain Limitation in Knee Osteoarthritis
- Conditions
- IntraarticularOzoneProlotherapyDexmedetomidinePainKnee Osteoarthritis
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT06909305
- Lead Sponsor
- Tanta University
- Brief Summary
This study aimed to compare intraarticular ozone injection, prolotherapy, or dexmedetomidine effectiveness in knee osteoarthritis patients.
- Detailed Description
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a heterogeneous group of disorders of different etiologies with similar biological, morphological, and clinical manifestations and outcomes. The intraarticular injection has been recommended to alleviate the pain in the knee joint.
Ozone therapy has long been used in the management of OA. Furthermore, it has been shown to not cause a significant inflammation process or cartilage degradation. Prolotherapy is a procedure where a natural irritant is injected into the soft tissue of an injured joint. Dexmedetomidine is a selective α2-adrenergic agonist with considerable sedative and analgesic actions.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Age from 30 to 65 years.
- Both genders.
- Patients diagnosed with stage 1-3 osteoarthritis according to the Kellgren-Lawrence Classification System (K-L).
- Patient refusal.
- History of knee trauma within the past month.
- Rheumatic disease.
- Pregnancy.
- Any surgical intervention of the knee.
- Severe cardiovascular disease.
- Morbid obese patients (body mass index (BMI) of >35 kg/m2).
- Local infection at the site of injection.
- Bleeding diathesis.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Ozone group Ozone Patients received intraarticular ozone injection. Dextrose prolotherapy group Dextrose prolotherapy Patients received intraarticular dextrose prolotherapy injection. Dexmedetomidine group Dexmedetomidine Patients received intraarticular dexmedetomidine injection.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Analgesic requirement 3 months after the procedure Analgesic requirements for pain control after injection were recorded.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Improvement of lifestyle 3 months after the procedure Improvement of lifestyle was assessed using the Western Ontario Mac Master Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC-OI) scale. The Likert type of the WOMAC Persian version was employed in this paper. The Persian version is a dependable and uncomplicated procedure that provides five responses: extreme (4), severe (3), moderate (2), mild (1), and none (0). The patients' stiffness, pain, and functional restriction are all represented by the higher scores.
Improvement of knee joint cartilage regeneration 3 months after the procedure Improvement of knee joint cartilage regeneration was assessed using the Kellgren-Lawrence Classification System (K-L). K-L: which categorize knee OA into four stages based on radiological findings: Grade 4 (severe): Marked joint space narrowing, large osteophytes, severe sclerosis, and definite deformity of bone ends. Grade 3 (moderate): Moderate multiple osteophytes, some sclerosis, definite joint space narrowing, and potential deformity of bone ends. Grade 2 (minimal): Definite osteophytes and potential joint space narrowing. Grade 1 (doubtful): Possible osteophytic lipping and doubtful joint space narrowing.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Tanta University
🇪🇬Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt
Tanta University🇪🇬Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt