Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Prolapse
- Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Registration Number
- NCT00476892
- Lead Sponsor
- Glasgow Caledonian University
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training in the management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
- Detailed Description
Pelvic organ prolapse is a common problem that adversely affects the daily activities and quality of life of many women. Pelvic floor muscle training interventions are commonly used by physiotherapists to manage prolapse. However, a Cochrane review found limited evidence to support the effectiveness of such interventions. Based on the findings of a successful feasibility study, this multi-centre randomised controlled trial will address the paucity of evidence. 556 symptomatic women with diagnosed prolapse will be enrolled in 16 UK centres and 1 New Zealand centre over 16 months and randomised to pelvic floor muscle training plus lifestyle advice, or to receive a lifestyle leaflet only. Principal measures of outcome are: prolapse symptoms, prolapse severity, and subsequent further treatment up to 12 months after trial entry.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 448
- New attendee at outpatient gynaecology clinic
- Any type of prolapse
- Stage 0 or IV prolapse
- Women reporting no symptoms of prolapse
- Previous treatment for prolapse (surgery or formal instruction in Pelvic Floor Muscle Training [PMFT,]unless completed more than 5 years ago, pessary, unless pessary removed more than 12 months ago)
- Unable to comply with PFMT
- women who have urogenital atrophy requiring treatment with local oestrogens (after an 8 week course of local oestrogen such women can be included);
- Pregnant or less than 6 months post-natal
- Unable to give informed consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Prolapse symptom score (questions developed in feasibility study and undergoing validation). Primary economic outcome measures are: use of health services, average number of days of prolapse symptoms and further prolapse treatment needed/received 1 year
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Prolapse-related quality of life, prolapse severity, need for further prolapse treatment. Other outcomes include: lifestyle changes, urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms, general health status. 1 year
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (28)
St George Hospital
🇦🇺Sydney, Australia
Antrim Area Hospital
🇮🇪Antrim, Ireland
Belfast City Hospital
🇮🇪Belfast, Ireland
Dunedin School of Medicine
🇳🇿Dunedin, New Zealand
Crosshouse Hospital / Ayrshire Maternity Hospital
🇬🇧Kilmarnock, Ayrshire, United Kingdom
Forth Park Hospital
🇬🇧Kirkcaldy, Fife, United Kingdom
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
🇬🇧Aberdeen, Grampian, United Kingdom
North Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust
🇬🇧Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
🇬🇧Edinburgh, Lothian, United Kingdom
St John's Hospital
🇬🇧Livingston, West Lothian, United Kingdom
Scroll for more (18 remaining)St George Hospital🇦🇺Sydney, Australia