Femoral Rotation and Patellar Positioning After TKA
- Conditions
- Knee OsteoarthritisKnee Pain ChronicJoint PainJoint InstabilityProsthetic ComplicationPatella Disorder
- Interventions
- Other: Use of dynamic tensioner
- Registration Number
- NCT05871112
- Lead Sponsor
- Medical University of Warsaw
- Brief Summary
Analysis of patellar positioning in the trochlear groove after TKA with and without the use of dynamic tensioner.
- Detailed Description
It appears that by precisely adjusting femoral component rotation and its relation to soft tissues in the area we can achieve better function of the patellofemoral joint and thus reduce the occurrence of anterior knee pain. Achieving proper femoral component rotation is challenging, as the bony landmarks are difficult to identify. This goal may be accomplished by using a dynamic tensioner - a device that intraoperatively measures joint gap stiffness in extension and 90 degrees flexion. This is especially important in knees with high grade arthritis and limb malalignment, where ligaments' and tendons' efficiency is affected.The aim of this study was to analyze patella positioning in the trochlear groove on CT scans of patients undergoing TKR with use of a dynamic tensioner and compare it to the ones undergoing standard measured-resection technique. Secondary outcome was to assess the frequency of anterior knee pain, range of motion and patient-reported outcome 3 and 12 months after the surgery.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 125
- age over 60
- BMI < 40
- ablity to walk for 10meters
- leg length discrepancy <5mm
- knee flexion > 90 degrees
- hip extension < 0 degrees
- hip flexion > 90 degrees
- III / IV level of osteoarthritis in Kellgren - Lawrence scale
- varus/valgus/ fixed flexion deformity > 15 degrees
- revision TKA
- prior UKA
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patella positioning after TKR + FUZION Use of dynamic tensioner Patients who underwent TKR - femoral component rotation established with a use of a dynamic tensioner (FUZION)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patella positioning in the trochlear groove on computed tomography (CT) after TKR January 2021 - August 2021 Analysis of CT scans of patients undergoing TKR in 30 degrees of knee flexion in the days following the procedure
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Prevalence of anterior knee pain after TKR January 2021 - January 2022 Assessment of the frequency of anterior knee pain 3 and 12 months after the surgery in the group with standard TKR and dynamic tensioner TKR
Patient-reported outcome after TKR January 2021 - January 2022 Assessment of patient-reported outcome 3 and 12 months after the surgery in the group with standard TKR and dynamic tensioner TKR
Range of motion after TKR January 2021 - January 2022 Assessment of range of motion 3 and 12 months after the surgery in the group with standard TKR and dynamic tensioner TKR
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Department of Othopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw
🇵🇱Warsaw, Mazovian, Poland