跳至主要内容
临床试验/ISRCTN62510577
ISRCTN62510577已完成未知

A multi-centre randomised controlled trial , with process evaluation, to test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of self-management of vaginal pessaries to treat pelvic organ prolapse, compared to standard care to improve women's quality of life

Glasgow Caledonian University0 个研究点目标入组 340 人开始时间: 2017年10月6日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
未知
状态
已完成
入组人数
340

研究概览

简要总结

2020 Protocol article in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33032651/ process evaluation protocol (added 14/10/2020) 2020 Protocol article in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33032644/ protocol (added 14/10/2020) 2022 Other publications in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36064727/ Theoretical and practical development of the TOPSY self-management intervention for women who use a vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse (added 06/09/2022) 2023 Results article in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38078194/ (added 19/12/2023) 2024 Results article in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38767959/ Clinical and cost-effectiveness (added 22/05/2024)

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

性别
Female

入选标准

  • 1. Women with pelvic organ prolapse of any type or stage
  • 2. Aged =18 years
  • 3. Women treated with a vaginal pessary
  • 4. Pessary retained for 2 weeks or more

排除标准

  • 1. Women with a shelf or Gellhorn pessary as these are difficult for women to remove and replace themselves
  • 2. Women lacking in manual dexterity, e.g. those with arthritis, as women would not be able to remove and replace her own pessary
  • 3. Women judged by the treating clinician to have a cognitive deficit such that she would be unable to give informed consent or understand self-management instruction
  • 4. Pregnant women

研究者

相似试验