Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06989502
NCT06989502Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

GH Project: NIHR150261 - Implementation of the COmmunity HEalth System InnovatiON Project, COHESION-I

Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia3 sites in 3 countries2,094 target enrollmentStarted: May 17, 2025Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Enrollment
2,094
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Patient Satisfaction (PS)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The COHESION-I project will evaluate the effects of the co-creation intervention (2016 to 2019) and the co-design intervention (2023 to 2024) on improving (a) health system responsiveness, and (b) patient satisfaction, at the primary health care level, in Peru, Nepal and Mozambique, in relation to chronic diseases (hypertension, and diabetes mellitus), as well as specific neglected tropical diseases. Each intervention has been tailored to the context and characteristics of each one of the aforementioned low- and middle-income countries.

For this quasi-experimental study, three arms were established: the co-creation (2016 to 2019) + co-design (2023 to 2024) arm; the co-design only (2023 to 2024) arm; and the control group (no intervention; usual care). The evaluation will be composed of four types of evaluations: quantitative; qualitative; economic; and process evaluation

Detailed Description

The COHESION-I project (I is for Intervention) has two main objectives: first, to implement and evaluate the context specific co-created interventions in the three countries - Mozambique, Nepal, and Peru (Component 1), and second, to explore the possibilities to transfer the experience and lessons learnt to other countries (India) for adaptation of such intervention approach in a different context (Component 2). COHESION-I continues and is based on a previous project called COHESION. The previous project, The COmmunity HEalth System InnovatiON (COHESION) project was a 4-year project that started in 2016 as a collaboration between research teams from Mozambique, Nepal, Peru and Switzerland. It enabled formative research to be conducted at policy, health system and community levels using tracer chronic conditions that included non-communicable diseases (NCDs) (diabetes and hypertension), and a specific neglected tropical disease (NTDs) (Schistosomiasis in Mozambique, Leprosy in Nepal and Epilepsy resulting from neurocysticercosis in Peru). The results from this formative research were utilised as part of a process for identifying adequate interventions through a participatory approach with communities, primary healthcare (PHC) workers, and regional health authorities. Meetings with different stakeholders were carried out between 2017 and 2018 to propose context- relevant interventions oriented to address the challenges of providing care for people affected by NCDs and NTDs. During the meetings, participants provided feedback regarding problems and potential solutions for chronic care and health services in general and proposed possible areas of intervention. Upon completion of all the meetings, each country identified the main components to be included in their interventions that were focussed on communities, healthcare workers and facilities. For example, the suggested intervention components in Mozambique include: (i) radio programs, spots, or podcasts and pamphlets to inform population about hypertension, (ii) development of facility-based guideline/algorithm, training in hypertension and clear communication, and group discussions on challenges and opportunities to manage chronic diseases, and (iii) establishment of a medical appointment system for people with chronic diseases.

In this new phase, the COHESION-I project, which will be conducted from 2022 to 2026, the impact of a co-creation/co-design strategy will be evaluated in terms of two main outcomes: on the one hand, improved health system responsiveness at primary care level and patient satisfaction and, on the other hand, improved health care for chronic diseases. The general research objective of COHESION-I is to implement and evaluate at the primary health care level the co-created/co-designed interventions in the selected settings in each of the three countries (Mozambique, Nepal and Peru), focusing on Non-Communicable Diseases (diabetes, hypertension) and Neglected Tropical Diseases (schistosomiasis in Mozambique, Leprosy in Nepal and neurocysticercosis in Peru). This study involves the following evaluation components: quantitative evaluation, qualitative evaluation, economic evaluation, and process evaluation. There will be five trimesters in total for undertaking these different types of evaluations.

This study will implement a mixed-methods approach that includes a pre-post quasi-experimental study: a quantitative component that will accrue an initial survey and five repeated measurements over time with an embedded qualitative study.The study will be developed in three low- and middle-income countries: Mozambique, Nepal and Peru. In each country, the COHESION-I project will be implemented in six sites (A, B, C, D, E and F). From these six sites, two of them have already been selected (A and B sites). The A and B sites are the ones where the co-creation process was conducted between 2016 - 2019, and now, during the current phase, receive the co-designed intervention (co-created + co-designed). Sites C and D have been selected and they have similar characteristics as sites A and B. The difference is that in the previous phase of the COHESION project did not hold any previous activity in these settings. Participants in sites C and D are being engaged for the first time and will receive the same co-designed intervention as sites A and B, but without having been involved in the co-creation process (2016 to 2019). Finally, sites E and F, will share similar characteristics as sites A, B, C, and D, but they will receive no intervention (control sites or usual care).

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •for PHC users with diabetes, hypertension, and/or NTDs:
  • •Males or females aged 18 years and over, from the selected sites
  • •Having used the health services in the previous three months
  • •Diagnosis (or estimated risk) of diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, or neurocysticercosis
  • •Must be able to listen to radio programs, or other audio material
  • •Inclusion Criteria for PHC users without diabetes, hypertension, and/or NTDs:
  • •Males or females aged 18 years and over, from the selected sites
  • •Having used the health services in the previous three months
  • •Must be able to listen to radio programs, or other audio material

Exclusion Criteria

  • •for PHC users without diabetes, hypertension, and/or NTDs:
  • •Diagnosis (or estimated risk) of diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, or neurocysticercosis
  • •The criteria mentioned above refer solely to the quantitative evaluation. For the other types of evaluation, some different populations will be included (such as healthcare workers, local authorities and other stakeholders).

Arms & Interventions

Co-creation (2016 to 2019) + Co-design (2023 to 2024)

Experimental

PERU:

  • Radio programs with content related to health care
  • Capacity building on management of diabetes, hypertension and neurocysticercosis
  • Communication jar to prompt communication between health workers and patients
  • Decentralized decision-making on facility improvement

NEPAL:

  • Radio and pamphlets to promote Primary Health Care (PHC)
  • Involvement of Female Community Health Volunteers
  • Capacity building on management of diabetes, hypertension and lepra
  • Flip charts, guidelines and posters for management of diseases and to prompt communication between health workers and patients
  • Decentralized decision-making on facility improvement

MOZAMBIQUE:

  • Radio and pamphlets informing population on hypertension, PHC and appointment system
  • Facility based guideline/algorithm
  • Capacity building on hypertension, diabetes and schistosomiasis
  • Establishment of an "information booth"
  • Group discussions on challenges and opportunities
  • Advocacy on the issue of access to medicines

Intervention: Co-creation (2016 to 2019) + Co-design (2023 to 2024) (Behavioral)

Co-design only (2023 to 2024)

Experimental

PERU:

  • Radio programs with content related to health care
  • Capacity building on management of diabetes, hypertension and neurocysticercosis
  • Communication jar to prompt communication between health workers and patients
  • Decentralized decision-making on facility improvement

NEPAL:

  • Radio and pamphlets to promote Primary Health Care (PHC)
  • Involvement of Female Community Health Volunteers
  • Capacity building on management of diabetes, hypertension and lepra
  • Flip charts, guidelines and posters for management of diseases and to prompt communication between health workers and patients
  • Decentralized decision-making on facility improvement

MOZAMBIQUE:

  • Radio and pamphlets informing population on hypertension, PHC and appointment system
  • Facility based guideline/algorithm
  • Capacity building on hypertension, diabetes and schistosomiasis
  • Establishment of an "information booth"
  • Group discussions on challenges and opportunities
  • Advocacy on the issue of access to medicines

Intervention: Co-design only (2023 to 2024) (Behavioral)

Control

No Intervention

Usual care, understood as the Primary Health Care (PHC) that the target patient population receives as part of the conventional or usual medical practice in each of their communities, in Peru, Nepal, and Mozambique

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Patient Satisfaction (PS)

Time Frame: Month 1 (baseline), Month 5 (pre-intervention), Month 9 (pre-intervention), Month 13 (during intervention), Month 17 (post-intervention), Month 21 (follow-up)

Score derived from the Short-Form Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18), which has been adapted in the local languages of Peru, Nepal, and Mozambique, from its original source in English. The questionnaire consists of 18 items, with classic Likert scale format (5 alternatives). The number of dimensions of Patient Satisfaction could vary by country, as literature demonstrates

Health System Responsiveness (HSR)

Time Frame: Month 1 (baseline), Month 9 (pre-intervention), Month 13 (during intervention), Month 17 (post-intervention)

Score derived from the World Health Organization Health System Responsiveness World Survey, including five -of the eight established- dimensions: autonomy, dignity, clear communication, choice of healthcare provider, and confidentiality. The questionnaire has been adapted in the local languages of Peru, Nepal, and Mozambique, from its original source in English; and it consists of 18 items, with diverse response alternatives (e.g. frequency, "yes or no", amongst other formats)

Quality of Life (QoL)

Time Frame: Month 1 (baseline), Month 9 (pre-intervention), Month 21 (follow-up)

Score derived from the 5-level EQ-5D version questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), which consists of 2 components. The first one is the EQ-5D descriptive system, which comprises five theoretical dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The second component is the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS), which records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can image' (score = 100), and 'The worst health you can image' (score = 0). The EQ-5D-5L official translations for Spanish, Nepali, and Portuguese will be used

Secondary Outcomes

  • Mechanism of Impact(Month 5 (pre-intervention), Month 13 (during intervention), Month 21 (follow-up))
  • Implementation outcomes (part 1)(Month 5 (pre-intervention), Month 13 (during intervention), Month 21 (follow-up))
  • Implementation outcomes (part 2)(Month 13 (during intervention))
  • Process evaluation: Context (part 2)(Month 5 (pre-intervention), Month 13 (during intervention), Month 21 (follow-up))
  • Process evaluation: Context (part 1)(Month 5 (pre-intervention), Month 21 (follow-up))
  • Quantitative evaluation(Month 1 (baseline), Month 5 (pre-intervention), Month 9 (pre-intervention), Month 13 (during intervention), Month 17 (post-intervention), Month 21 (follow-up))
  • Qualitative evaluation(Month 1 (baseline), Month 8 (pre-intervention), Month 14 (during intervention), Month 20 (post-intervention))
  • Economic evaluation 1(Month 5 (pre-intervention), Month 21 (follow-up))
  • Economic evaluation 2(Month 9 (pre-intervention), Month 13 (during intervention), Month 17 (post-intervention), Month 21 (follow-up))

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

María Lazo Porras

Research Associate at CRONICAS

Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials