Conservative vs Surgical Treatment for Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly
- Conditions
- Shoulder Fractures
- Interventions
- Procedure: Osteosynthesis with locking plateProcedure: Sling
- Registration Number
- NCT02913378
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo
- Brief Summary
This is a randomized trial comparing conservative with surgical treatment (with open reduction and locking plate fixation) for proximal humeral fractures in patients aged more than 60 years.
- Detailed Description
Different methods have been used in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Usually, treatment choice depends on fracture displacement, patient age, osteoporosis, and other characteristics. Locking plate fixation has become the most widely used method among surgical techniques, while partial arthroplasty is reserved for older patients and comminuted articular fractures. Generally, nonsurgical treatment involves a brief period with sling immobilization and physiotherapy rehabilitation.
A recent multicenter study showed no difference between conservative and surgical treatments, including internal fixation with locking plates. Two other randomized studies showed mixed results, with no relevant clinical differences between the methods. No previous trial has evaluated the quality of reduction in surgically treated fractures and its relation to outcomes. Our study aims to compare both techniques with a detailed radiographic and tomographic evaluation, in elderly patients. We also aim to evaluate the influence of reduction and plate positioning on clinical outcomes. This is a single center trial, in which surgeries will be performed by only two experienced surgeons.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 58
- Proximal humeral fractures, involving humeral head, with at least one of the following parameters:
- Head-shaft angle between 100-200° or >175° on coronal plane;
- Shaft translation (on coronal or sagittal plane) > 1cm;
- Tuberosity displacement > 0,5cm;
- Head shaft angulation >45° in axial or sagittal plane;
- Less then 30 days
- No contact between shaft and humeral head
- Head-shaft angle <100° on coronal plane
- Articular head fracture with displacement > 2mm
- Fracture-dislocation
- Bilateral fracture
- Open fracture
- Ipsilateral or contralateral superior limb fracture
- Pathological fracture (tumors or bone disease, except for osteoporosis)
- Previous rotator cuff complete tear
- Previous infection
- Neurological injury
- Previous shoulder surgery
- Inability to answer subjective scores
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Locking plate Osteosynthesis with locking plate Surgical treatment with open reduction and osteosynthesis with locking plate Conservative Sling Conservative treatment with sling and rehabilitation
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Individual relative Constant-Murley score 2 years Constant-Murley score relative to the unaffected shoulder
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score 2 years Subjective functional evaluation
Constant-Murley score 2 years Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain 2 years Complication and reoperation rate 2 years Rotator cuff ultrasound and magnetic resonance 2 years 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) 2 years Quality of life evaluation
Radiographic evaluation 2 years Union, head-shaft angle, tuberosities reduction, medial support and Fjalestad reduction criteria
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Sao Paulo - Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology
🇧🇷Sao Paulo, Brazil