MedPath

Conservative vs Surgical Treatment for Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly

Not Applicable
Conditions
Shoulder Fractures
Interventions
Procedure: Osteosynthesis with locking plate
Procedure: Sling
Registration Number
NCT02913378
Lead Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Brief Summary

This is a randomized trial comparing conservative with surgical treatment (with open reduction and locking plate fixation) for proximal humeral fractures in patients aged more than 60 years.

Detailed Description

Different methods have been used in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Usually, treatment choice depends on fracture displacement, patient age, osteoporosis, and other characteristics. Locking plate fixation has become the most widely used method among surgical techniques, while partial arthroplasty is reserved for older patients and comminuted articular fractures. Generally, nonsurgical treatment involves a brief period with sling immobilization and physiotherapy rehabilitation.

A recent multicenter study showed no difference between conservative and surgical treatments, including internal fixation with locking plates. Two other randomized studies showed mixed results, with no relevant clinical differences between the methods. No previous trial has evaluated the quality of reduction in surgically treated fractures and its relation to outcomes. Our study aims to compare both techniques with a detailed radiographic and tomographic evaluation, in elderly patients. We also aim to evaluate the influence of reduction and plate positioning on clinical outcomes. This is a single center trial, in which surgeries will be performed by only two experienced surgeons.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
58
Inclusion Criteria
  • Proximal humeral fractures, involving humeral head, with at least one of the following parameters:
  • Head-shaft angle between 100-200° or >175° on coronal plane;
  • Shaft translation (on coronal or sagittal plane) > 1cm;
  • Tuberosity displacement > 0,5cm;
  • Head shaft angulation >45° in axial or sagittal plane;
  • Less then 30 days
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • No contact between shaft and humeral head
  • Head-shaft angle <100° on coronal plane
  • Articular head fracture with displacement > 2mm
  • Fracture-dislocation
  • Bilateral fracture
  • Open fracture
  • Ipsilateral or contralateral superior limb fracture
  • Pathological fracture (tumors or bone disease, except for osteoporosis)
  • Previous rotator cuff complete tear
  • Previous infection
  • Neurological injury
  • Previous shoulder surgery
  • Inability to answer subjective scores
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Locking plateOsteosynthesis with locking plateSurgical treatment with open reduction and osteosynthesis with locking plate
ConservativeSlingConservative treatment with sling and rehabilitation
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Individual relative Constant-Murley score2 years

Constant-Murley score relative to the unaffected shoulder

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score2 years

Subjective functional evaluation

Constant-Murley score2 years
Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain2 years
Complication and reoperation rate2 years
Rotator cuff ultrasound and magnetic resonance2 years
12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)2 years

Quality of life evaluation

Radiographic evaluation2 years

Union, head-shaft angle, tuberosities reduction, medial support and Fjalestad reduction criteria

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Sao Paulo - Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology

🇧🇷

Sao Paulo, Brazil

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath