Midline Failures: A Comparison Between a Hydrophilic Biomaterial and Thermoplastic Polyurethane

Completed

• Conditions: Midline Catheter
• Interventions: Device: HydroMID; Device: TPU

• Registration Number: NCT04911842
• Lead Sponsor: Access Vascular Inc

Brief Summary

Retrospective chart review to evaluate and compare the rate of failures between midlines made from different materials

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2021-05-20
• Study First Submitted: 2021-05-25
• Study First Submitted QC: 2021-05-28
• Study First Posted: 2021-06-03
• Primary Completion: 2021-12-02
• Study Completion: 2022-01-18
• Status Verified: 2023-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2023-01-31
• Last Update Posted: 2023-02-02

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 205

Inclusion Criteria

• Subjects who have been inserted with the HydroMID by the vascular access group
• Subjects who have been inserted with a competitor 4 Fr single lumen by the vascular access team

Exclusion Criteria

• Any off-label use (PICC lines cut to be midlines for any manufacturer)

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
HBM	HydroMID	Hydrophilic BioMaterial
TPU	TPU	Thermoplastic polyurethane

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The primary objective of this chart review is to evaluate the rates of failure of midlines made from different materials.	retrospective review- March 2021 through May 2021

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To compare the proportion of times the midline was used to successfully complete prescribed length.	retrospective review- March 2021 through May 2021

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Joseph Bunch; 🇺🇸 Romeoville, Illinois, United States