MedPath

Pilot Trial of Virtual and In-person STEP2

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Oncology
Interventions
Behavioral: Virtual and in-person Symptom screening with Targeted Early Palliative care (STEP2)
Registration Number
NCT06326554
Lead Sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the feasibility of offering oncology patients a referral to the outpatient palliative care clinic based on virtual symptom screening before oncology clinic appointments, and to qualitatively explore factors patients consider when deciding to accept or defer a visit to this clinic.

Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires assessing quality of life, symptom burden, depression, anxiety, and satisfaction with care at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 months.

Detailed Description

To improve equitable access to early palliative care based on symptom severity, the investigators developed Symptom screening with Targeted Early Palliative care (STEP) and demonstrated its feasibility in a previous trial. STEP was designed and tested before the COVID-19 pandemic and was based on symptom screening using tablets/computers in oncology clinics and in-person visits in the palliative care clinic. In response to changes in hospital care as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the investigators developed a novel, mixed in-person and virtually delivered intervention, STEP2.

The investigators propose to test STEP2 in a single-arm pilot trial, enrolling outpatients with advanced cancer and a prognosis of 6 months to 3 years. Participants will complete the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r+) tool electronically before oncology appointments (as is usual care in Ontario, Canada); in addition, if patients report moderate to high symptom scores, they will receive nurse-led triage and targeted referral to specialized palliative care. Quality of life, symptom burden, depression, anxiety and satisfaction with care will be assessed at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 months using questionnaires.

The objectives of this study are 1) to assess the feasibility of the STEP2 intervention, including completion of virtual symptom screening before oncology clinic appointments and completing triggered palliative care visits by video as well as in person; and 2) to explore factors patients consider when deciding to accept or defer a visit to the outpatient palliative care clinic.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • age 18+ years
  • stage IV cancer (stage III or IV for lung or pancreas cancers; hormone-refractory for prostate and ER-positive breast cancers)
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • oncologist-estimated prognosis of 6-36 months
  • willingness to complete routine online symptom screening at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • insufficient English literacy to complete study procedures
  • oncologist-determined poor cognitive status
  • already received or currently receiving specialized palliative care
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
STEP2Virtual and in-person Symptom screening with Targeted Early Palliative care (STEP2)Moderate-to-severe symptoms on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r+) tool will trigger an email to the study team and the study triage nurse. The study triage nurse will review the scores via electronic medical record and call the patient within 2 business days to offer immediate advice by phone. During the phone call, the study triage nurse will offer to schedule a formal in-person or virtual palliative care clinic (PCC) visit. Participants agreeing to the PCC referral subsequently receive at least monthly in-person and/or virtual PCC follow-up visits until study end, based on patient needs and care provider preference.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
FACIT-PAL 146 months

A 14-item version of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) scale, with items that are considered relevant for patients with advanced cancer. Scoring ranges from 0-56 with lower scores indicating better quality of life.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
FACIT-PAL 142 and 4 months

A 14-item version of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) scale, with items that are considered relevant for patients with advanced cancer. Scores range from 0-4 per item with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.

ESAS-r-CS2, 4, and 6 months

Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r-CS) measure with eleven scales with anchors of 0 (best) and 10 (worst) for pain, fatigue, drowsiness, nausea, anxiety, depression, appetite, dyspnea, well-being, constipation and sleep.

PHQ-92, 4, and 6 months

A 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for screening, diagnosing and monitoring the severity of depression. Scores range from 0-3 per item with higher scores indicating worse depression.

FAMCARE-P162, 4, and 6 months

Modified family caregiver (FAMCARE) scale measuring patient satisfaction with information-giving, availability of care, psychological care and physical patient care in patients with advanced cancer. Scores range from 1-5 per item with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder-72, 4, and 6 months

A valid and brief 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) tool measuring severity of anxiety in patients. Scores range from 0-3 per item with higher scores indicating worse anxiety.

Patient Global Impression of Change2, 4, and 6 months

A single-item patient-reported measure assessing change in health status and efficacy of an intervention, and is a widely used clinically relevant tool across many health conditions. The scale ranges from 1-7 and higher scores indicate worse change in health status.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath