Patient Decision Aid Tool for HPV Vaccination Among Adults Ages 27-45 Years Old
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 632
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Decisional conflict - 16 item scale
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this study is to learn if a patient decision tool for HPV vaccination works for decision-making among adults ages 27-45. Researchers will compare a web-based patient decision tool to an information sheet to see if the tool works for decision-making. Participants will take a baseline survey, view the intervention or control condition, and then take a follow-up survey.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 27 Years 至 45 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Unvaccinated for HPV
- •27-45 years
- •Resides in the United States
- •Reads English
- •Consents to participate
排除标准
- 未提供
研究组 & 干预措施
Control
Vaccine information sheet on HPV vaccination view on webpage.
干预措施: Control (Behavioral)
Patient decision aid
Patient decision aid on HPV vaccination on webpage.
干预措施: Patient decision aid (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Decisional conflict - 16 item scale
时间窗: Immediate post-test
This scale has 16 items and 5 response categories. The decisional conflict scale (DCS) measures personal perceptions of: uncertainty in choosing options; modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty such as feeling uninformed, unclear about personal values and unsupported in decision making; and effective decision making (in full version) such as feeling the choice is informed, values-based, likely to be implemented and expressing satisfaction with the choice. The scores ranged from 0 "no conflict" to 100 "extreme decisional conflict."
Decisional conflict - 4 item scale
时间窗: Immediate post-test
Decision conflict scale recommended for every day clinical practice. It has 4 items and two response categories. Scores range from 0 \[extremely high decisional conflict\] to 4 \[no decisional conflict\].
次要结局
- Knowledge(Immediate post-test)
- Perceived expectation(Immediate post-test)
- Intentions(Immediate post-test)
- Decision self-efficacy(Immediate post-test)
- Perceived risk(Immediate post-test)
- Decision(Immediate post-test)
研究者
Erika L. Thompson
Associate Professor
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio