跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02339246
NCT02339246已完成3 期

A Steady-state Pharmacokinetic Comparison Of All FK-506 Formulations

Veloxis Pharmaceuticals1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 32 人开始时间: 2015年1月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
32
试验地点
1
主要终点
Evaluation of T(Max) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of the study is to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of three different formulations of tacrolimus.

Eligible patients will be treated with all three formulations in a pre-defined sequence.

详细描述

The pharmacokinetic parameters T(max), C(max) and AUC(0-24) will be compared between the three formulations Envarsus XR once daily, Astagraf XL once daily and Prograf Twice daily.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Basic Science
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Renal transplant recipients, males or females, of 18 years of age or above.
  • Able to participate and willing to give written informed consent and to comply with study visits and restrictions.
  • Able to understand English.
  • Patients having received a primary or secondary renal transplant

排除标准

  • Evidence of acute rejection episode within the past three months prior to screening.
  • Recipients of organ transplants other than kidney.
  • Patients who are known to be HIV positive.

研究组 & 干预措施

Prograf vs Envarsus XR vs Astagraf XL

Active Comparator

Prograft capsules Twice daily for 7 days, followed by Envarsus XR tablets once daily for 7 days followed by Astagraf XL capsules once daily for 7 days.

干预措施: Prograf vs Envarsus XR vs Astagraf XL (Drug)

Prograf vs Astagraf XL vs Envarsus XR

Active Comparator

Prograf capsules twice daily for 7 days followed by Astagraf XL capsules once daily for 7 days followed by Envarsus XR tablets once daily.

干预措施: Prograf vs Astagraf XL vs Envarsus XR (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Evaluation of T(Max) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.

时间窗: 8 days

Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling times was used to calculate T(max). Nominal time points used were: Prograf sampling strategy (21 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 14.5, 15, 16, 18, 20, and 24. Envarsus XR sampling strategy (18 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, and 27. Astagraf XL sampling strategy (17 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 24.

Evaluation of C(Max) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.

时间窗: 8 days

Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling times was used to calculate C(max). Nominal time points used were: Prograf sampling strategy (21 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 14.5, 15, 16, 18, 20, and 24. Envarsus XR sampling strategy (18 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, and 27. Astagraf XL sampling strategy (17 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 24.

Evaluation of AUC(0-24) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.

时间窗: 8 days

Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling times was used to calculate AUC(0-24). Nominal time points used were: Prograf sampling strategy (21 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 14.5, 15, 16, 18, 20, and 24. Envarsus XR sampling strategy (18 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, and 27. Astagraf XL sampling strategy (17 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 24.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Veloxis Pharmaceuticals
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验