The Musculocutaneous Nerve in a High Resolution MRI

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Brachial Plexus Block

• Registration Number: NCT02305875
• Lead Sponsor: Diakonhjemmet Hospital

Brief Summary

The investigators have made a favourable experience with the in 2006 published transarterial triple injection method \[4\]. This classic method combines the block effect of an axillary catheter injection (median nerve position) with a double transarterial injection at terminal nerve level in the axilla.

The investigators experience after a recent published MRI study \[3\], confirms that a proximal axillary local anesthetic injection via an axillary catheter, guided by nerve stimulator, is beneficial for the block effect. The MRI study was conducted using nerve stimulation and a transarterial technique. The proximal injection with an effect at cord level, combined with axillary injections at terminal nerve level, produce an effective block distal to the elbow.

The proximal injection has obviously an effect to the lateral cord and the musculocutaneous nerve (mcn) \[3\]. Recent studies have advocated that a double axillary injection method is sufficient for the axillary block \[5, 6\]. Their block techniques included a selective block of the mcn at terminal nerve level. The investigators MRI study \[3\] demonstrated a successful block effect (analgesia or anaesthesia) of the mcn nerve in all patients (15 of 15 patients) in the triple injection group without a selective block of this nerve. In the 1- deposit (catheter injection) and 2-deposit (transarterial injections) group, 11 of 15 patients (73%) had the mcn successful blocked.

The objective in this study (Article 4) is to examine the mean position of the mcn nerve and its relationship to the coracobrachial muscle. Can MRI indicate / predict that a proximal directed axillary catheter in median nerve position is beneficial in order to provide a successful mcn blockade? Is a selective injection to the mcn at terminal nerve level superfluous when a catheter is used?

Detailed Description

45 patients were examined with MRI in a previous study \[3\] and now they underwent an additionally examination with a special focus on the anatomy and course of the mcn nerve. A line was drawn from the most cranial part of the humeral head perpendicular towards the brachial plexus. The distance from this line to the point where the mcn nerve entered the coracobrachial muscle was measured. This entering point was defined as the point where the mcn nerve left the axillary sheat. The visulaity of the mcn was scored as 0 = not visible, 1 = partly visible and 2 = clear visible.

The evaluation was a consensus assessment where all authors evaluated the T2-weighted, fat suppressed MRI images at the same time. If the mcn nerve could not be identified, the patients were excluded.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2014-10
• Study First Submitted: 2014-11-19
• Study First Submitted QC: 2014-11-29
• Study First Posted: 2014-12-03
• Primary Completion: 2015-04
• Status Verified: 2015-05
• Study Completion: 2015-05
• Last Update Submitted: 2015-05-15
• Last Update Posted: 2015-05-18

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 54

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients scheduled for hand surgery
• ASA 1 - 2
• Weight from 50 - 95 kg
• MR compatible, suitable

Exclusion Criteria

• Neurologic deficit
• Reaction to LA

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Position of the musculocutaneous nerve in the axillary sheat. Mean distance in cm to the humeral head and the insertion point of the catheter in 54 patients.	6 months

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The Intervention Centre, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital; 🇳🇴 Oslo, Norway