JPRN-UMIN000039212
Recruiting
Phase 4
Oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol for induction of labor in women with pre labour rupture of membranes. Results of a randomized controlled trial - Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for PROM
JNMC0 sites51 target enrollmentJanuary 20, 2021
ConditionsPremature rupture of membranes at term
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Premature rupture of membranes at term
- Sponsor
- JNMC
- Enrollment
- 51
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 3
Comparison of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for legal abortioMedical abortion.termination of pregnancyIRCT2014110812789N9Vice Chancellor for Research, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences70
Completed
Not Applicable
role misoprostol in opertaive hysteroscopyFertility-femalegynecologyPACTR201502001022393cairo university500
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of oral misoprostol with vaginal prostin for induction of labour at term with prolonged rupture of membranesPregnancy and Childbirth: Labour inductionPregnancy and ChildbirthISRCTN57744215Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2004 Update - Department of Health (UK)200
Completed
Not Applicable
Effect of misoprostol in labor induction in post-term pregnanciesEfficacy on induction of labor.Failed medical induction of labourIRCT2014061412789N3Vice Chancellor for Research, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences180
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Efficacy and safety comparison of oral misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labourHealth Condition 1: null- All fullterm pregnant patients having live singleton fetus with vertex presentation and Bishops less than score 5.CTRI/2012/04/002561AGMC and GBP Hospital Agartala130