Pain Inhibition and Facilitation in Recurrent Low Back Pain
- Conditions
- Recurrent Low Back PainHealthy
- Registration Number
- NCT03463759
- Lead Sponsor
- Aalborg University
- Brief Summary
This study evaluates psychophysical measures of pain inhibition and facilitation, along with cortical responses to different sensory stimuli, in patients with recurrent low back pain and matched healthy individuals.
- Detailed Description
Pain inhibitory and facilitatory mechanisms have been suggested to play a role in the development of persistent low back pain; however, there is still debate on when changes in these mechanisms occur. Similarly, evoked cortical responses can reflect neuroplastic changes in pain processing regions, which are also thought to play a role in the transition to persistent pain, but there is also debate on when these neuroplastic changes develop relative to low back pain. Therefore, this study will use patients with an intermediary clinical pain state, recurrent low back pain, and matched healthy control participants, to investigate within and between subject differences in pain inhibitory, facilitatory and neuroplastic mechanisms.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Temporal Summation of Pain Day 0 vs. Day 28 Pain rating (VAS) change over a series of 10 repeated mechanical stimuli
Conditioned Pain Modulation Day 0 vs. Day 28 Pressure pain threshold (kPa) as test stimulus before compared to during a pressure conditioning stimulus on the lower leg
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pressure Pain Thresholds Day 0 vs. Day 28 Threshold of pain detection (kPa) with handheld algometry over the low back and distant sites
Thermal Pain Thresholds Day 0 vs. Day 28 Hot and cold pain detection thresholds (degrees)
Proprioceptive Weighting Day 0 vs. Day 28 Center of pressure displacement during 1-minute of quiet standing
Two Point Discrimination Day 0 vs. Day 28 The smallest distance (mm) for which two separate points can be distinguished over the low back
Sensory Evoked Potentials Day 0 vs. Day 28 EEG signals recorded in response to laser and electrical stimuli applied to the back
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
CNAP, SMI, Aalborg University
🇩🇰Aalborg, Denmark