MedPath

Comparative Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of L-ESPB Versus Absence of Locoregional Block in Hip Surgery

Phase 4
Recruiting
Conditions
Hip Fractures
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block
Registration Number
NCT06567522
Lead Sponsor
Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Recruiting
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
Not specified
Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:<br><br> - Both sexes over 18 years of age having undergone hip surgery<br><br> - ASA I-III (classification system used by the American Society of Anesthesiologists<br> where I is low anesthetic risk and IV is high risk)<br><br> - Capacity to comprehend the principles of pain assessment using the VAS visual<br> analogue scale<br><br> - Previously signed an informed consent.<br><br>Exclusion Criteria:<br><br> - Contraindications for the technique and/or the drugs used in this context<br><br> - Technical inability to perform the block<br><br> - Severe cognitive impairment or prior mental disabilities described in their medical<br> records<br><br> - Patients already included in other clinical trials.

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To compare the analgesic effectiveness and safety of lumbar ESP block versus absence of block after hip and proximal femur surgeries by means of the VAS scale with pain reduction of at least 1 point in the first two hours after surgery.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Compare the analgesic postoperative needs after performing L-ESP block versus a control group of patients having undergone hip or proximal femur surgeries and the postoperative consumption of opioids in both groups;Percentage of patients with technical ease to perform the esp-l block;Patient satisfaction survey on pain management;Describe de side effects of the lumbar ESP block and morphine
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath