CTRI/2025/03/081760尚未招募2/3 期
Traditional Buccal Elevation Technique vs Palatal Elevation Technique (PET) for Intra-alveolar Extraction of Grossly Decayed Maxillary Third Molars: A Comparative Study
Dr.N.T.R University of Health Sciences1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2025年3月17日最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2/3 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 30
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- The novel palatal elevation technique would be an effective alternative for buccal elevation technique for extraction of grossly decayed maxillary third molars in terms of swiftness and intraoperative complication rate is less with PET when compared to traditional buccal elevation technique.
研究概览
简要总结
The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the newly modified palatal elevation technique with already exisisting buccal elevation technique for closed extraction of grossly decayed maxillary third molars. The techniques are evaluated based on three parameters which are 1) time required for extraction 2)intra-operative complications and 3) postoperative complications.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •1.Patients within the age range of 18-60 years.
- •2.Patients with at least one grossly decayed maxillary third molar indicated for extraction.
- •3.Patients with no relevant medical history that contraindicates tooth extraction.
- •4.Patients with adequate inter incisal opening.
- •Patients with thick and inextensible cheeks.
排除标准
- •1.Patients whose mouth opening is severely restricted with underlying conditions like oral submucous fibrosis, myofacial pain dysfunction syndrome, internal derangement of TMJ, myositis of masticatory muscles.
- •2.Patients taking medications affecting bone remodelling process (i.e. bisphosphonates) 3.Patients with buccally tipped maxillary third molars.
结局指标
主要结局
The novel palatal elevation technique would be an effective alternative for buccal elevation technique for extraction of grossly decayed maxillary third molars in terms of swiftness and intraoperative complication rate is less with PET when compared to traditional buccal elevation technique.
时间窗: No time point
次要结局
- The post-operative complication rate would be less with PET compared to traditional buccal elevation technique(At the end of 7 days)
研究者
研究点 (1)
Loading locations...
相似试验
Unknown
不适用
Intraoral Maxillary Protraction Technique vs Facemask Using Alt-RAMEC Protocol for Treatment Class III Growing PatientsOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationNCT05345756Cairo University22
已完成
不适用
Palatal Versus Buccal Protraction Using Plates Assisted With Facemask in Growing Class III PatientsClass III MalocclusionNCT06452368Mansoura University20
Unknown
不适用
Buccal Infiltration Technique Compared to Inferior Alveolar TechniqueLocal Anesthetic ComplicationNCT04812639Cairo University22
尚未招募
1 期
Determination of the efficiency of the palatal anterior superior alveolar nerve block to provide adequate anterior maxillary anesthesia and its comparison with the infraorbital nerve blockCTRI/2018/12/016736amita Vora
已完成
不适用
Buccal Plate Augmentation With Different Hydroxyapatite Based MaterialEdentulousNCT01344577University of Trieste96