Cinenses Lung Volume Reduction Reverser System First-in-man Study Treating Patients With Severe Emphysema
- Conditions
- Emphysema
- Interventions
- Device: Cinenses Lung Volume Reduction Reverser System
- Registration Number
- NCT03685526
- Lead Sponsor
- Lifetech Scientific (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
- Brief Summary
The study is designed as a prospective, nonrandomized, exploratory, single center, first-in-man study. The objective of this study is to evaluate its safety and feasibility of the CinensesTM Lung Volume Reduction Reverser System in patients with severe emphysema. The study will also collect clinical data up to 6-month follow-up to explore its safety and effectiveness.
- Detailed Description
The study is designed as a prospective, nonrandomized, exploratory, single center, first-in-man study. The objective of this study is to evaluate its safety and feasibility of the CinensesTM Lung Volume Reduction Reverser System in patients with severe emphysema. The study will also collect clinical data up to 6-month follow-up to explore its safety and effectiveness. Study Population :Patients with severe emphysema and have to meet all the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Sample Size: 15 subjects
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 15
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Interventional arm Cinenses Lung Volume Reduction Reverser System Patients will be treated with Cinenses Lung Volume Reduction Reverser System.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Incidence of adverse events 3-month post final bronchoscopy Evaluate adverse events associated with implantation of the Cinenses Lung Volume Reduction Reverser System at 3-month post final bronchoscopy. CinensesTMLung Volume Reduction Reverser System at 3-month post final bronchoscopy.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Device success (Device level) immediate postoperative Device success was defined as successful delivery and deployment of the study device at the intended target position and successful withdrawal of the delivery system.
Procedural success during the hospital stay Procedural success was defined as all the study devices that were intended to be used during one procedure were achieved device success and the subject was without the occurrence of device-related or procedure-related SAEs during the hospital stay
Improvement in the mMRC dyspnea scale 1,3,6-month,12-month follow-up Improvement in the mMRC dyspnea scale from baseline (Pre-Treatment Visit) compared to 1-, 3- and 6-month,12-month follow-up.
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score 1,3,6-month,12-month follow-up The improvement of St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score from baseline (Pre-Treatment Visit) to 1-, 3- and 6-month ,12-month follow-up.
Percent change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second 1,3,6-month,12-month follow-up Percent change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline (Pre- Treatment Visit) compared to 1-, 3- and 6-month,12-month follow-up.
Decrease in the Residual Volume (RV) 1,3,6-month,12-month follow-up Decrease in the Residual Volume (RV) from baseline (Pre-Treatment Visit) compared to
1-, 3- and 6-month,12-month follow-up.Improvement in the 6-minute walk test 1,3,6-month,12-month follow-up Improvement in the 6-minute walk test from baseline (Pre-Treatment Visit) compared to
1-, 3- and 6-month,12-month follow-up
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Thoraxklinik am Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
🇩🇪Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany