MedPath

Cinenses Lung Volume Reduction Reverser System First-in-man Study Treating Patients With Severe Emphysema

Not Applicable
Conditions
Emphysema
Interventions
Device: Cinenses Lung Volume Reduction Reverser System
Registration Number
NCT03685526
Lead Sponsor
Lifetech Scientific (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Brief Summary

The study is designed as a prospective, nonrandomized, exploratory, single center, first-in-man study. The objective of this study is to evaluate its safety and feasibility of the CinensesTM Lung Volume Reduction Reverser System in patients with severe emphysema. The study will also collect clinical data up to 6-month follow-up to explore its safety and effectiveness.

Detailed Description

The study is designed as a prospective, nonrandomized, exploratory, single center, first-in-man study. The objective of this study is to evaluate its safety and feasibility of the CinensesTM Lung Volume Reduction Reverser System in patients with severe emphysema. The study will also collect clinical data up to 6-month follow-up to explore its safety and effectiveness. Study Population :Patients with severe emphysema and have to meet all the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Sample Size: 15 subjects

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
15
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Interventional armCinenses Lung Volume Reduction Reverser SystemPatients will be treated with Cinenses Lung Volume Reduction Reverser System.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Incidence of adverse events3-month post final bronchoscopy

Evaluate adverse events associated with implantation of the Cinenses Lung Volume Reduction Reverser System at 3-month post final bronchoscopy. CinensesTMLung Volume Reduction Reverser System at 3-month post final bronchoscopy.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Device success (Device level)immediate postoperative

Device success was defined as successful delivery and deployment of the study device at the intended target position and successful withdrawal of the delivery system.

Procedural successduring the hospital stay

Procedural success was defined as all the study devices that were intended to be used during one procedure were achieved device success and the subject was without the occurrence of device-related or procedure-related SAEs during the hospital stay

Improvement in the mMRC dyspnea scale1,3,6-month,12-month follow-up

Improvement in the mMRC dyspnea scale from baseline (Pre-Treatment Visit) compared to 1-, 3- and 6-month,12-month follow-up.

St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score1,3,6-month,12-month follow-up

The improvement of St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score from baseline (Pre-Treatment Visit) to 1-, 3- and 6-month ,12-month follow-up.

Percent change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second1,3,6-month,12-month follow-up

Percent change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline (Pre- Treatment Visit) compared to 1-, 3- and 6-month,12-month follow-up.

Decrease in the Residual Volume (RV)1,3,6-month,12-month follow-up

Decrease in the Residual Volume (RV) from baseline (Pre-Treatment Visit) compared to

1-, 3- and 6-month,12-month follow-up.

Improvement in the 6-minute walk test1,3,6-month,12-month follow-up

Improvement in the 6-minute walk test from baseline (Pre-Treatment Visit) compared to

1-, 3- and 6-month,12-month follow-up

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Thoraxklinik am Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg

🇩🇪

Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath