Comparative evaluation of the efficiency and patient perception towards conventional rubber dam and Insta dam for restoration of primary mandibular molars: A randomized clinical trial

The oral cavity is a complex environment surrounded by hard and soft tissues. Most dental materials are hydrophobic, making moisture control essential for successful treatment. Challenges such as saliva, microorganisms, and limited control of the patient’s tongue and soft tissues make isolation difficult. Effective isolation improves treatment quality, safety, and longevity, while also preventing aspiration or ingestion of foreign objects. Rubber dam isolation was first introduced by Dr. Sanford Christie Barnum in 1869. Although its use declined in the early 20th century due to alternative methods and evolving dental practices, it remains a widely accepted and efficient isolation technique today, offering better visibility, moisture control, and a sterile field. Pediatric patients pose unique challenges for isolation due to limited cooperation. Common techniques include rubber dams, cotton rolls, saliva ejectors, gauze, and throat shields. While rubber dams are effective, traditional metal clamps can cause discomfort, soft-tissue injury, and anxiety in children.

So, a newer advancement known as Insta dam is there.

Insta-Dam is a frameless, foldable rubber dam that eliminates the need for a traditional frame. It offers full isolation with just a single hole punch, is more comfortable, reduces gag reflex, allows easy X-rays, and improves workflow. It enhances infection control, reduces microleakage, supports shade matching, and improves treatment outcomes.

Despite these advantages, limited research has focused on patient comfort, cooperation, and clinical efficiency of Insta-Dam in pediatric dentistry. Therefore, the current study aims to compare the efficiency and patient perception of Insta-Dam with conventional rubber dams in restoring primary mandibular molars in children aged 7-10 years.