Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03222414
NCT03222414
Terminated
Not Applicable

Non-invasive Versus Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement in the Morbidly Obese Parturient (BMI >= 40 kg/m2) With Severe Preeclampsia: A Comparison of Direct Arterial Blood Pressure Measurements With Readings Obtained Using Either Large Cylindrical or Novel Conical Bariatric Upper Arm Blood Pressure Cuffs

Vanderbilt University Medical Center1 site in 1 country3 target enrollmentMay 1, 2015

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Pre-Eclampsia
Sponsor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Enrollment
3
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Comparison of Noninvasive Systolic Blood Pressure Readings to Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The study will compare agreement of invasive blood pressure measurements with non-invasive blood pressure measurements measured with a conical blood pressure and large standard upper arm rectangular cuff in morbidly obese severely hypertensive (systolic blood pressure > 160 mmHg) parturients.

Detailed Description

A morbidly obese \[Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2\] pregnant woman is at singular risk for all the complications of pregnancy, most notably preeclampsia (PE). Furthermore a woman who is already chronically hypertensive is likely to develop superimposed PE . Uncontrolled systolic hypertension in pregnancy prompts placental abruption, hemorrhagic stroke, and systolic or diastolic heart failure. Accurate blood pressure measurement is therefore a prerequisite to controlling dangerously high systolic blood pressure (SBP) to enable labor and delivery to be conducted safely in association with PE. Precise SBP measurement is also a precondition for clinically testing hypotheses concerning the existence of druggable targets that will allow prolongation of pregnancy in the face of severe PE and /or intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR) remote from term. Oscillometric noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement is the customary standard blood pressure monitoring method most often used in the labor suite and obstetric operating room today. For this purpose a rectangular, cylindrical blood pressure (BP) cuff placed on the upper arm is connected to an oscillometric blood pressure device. Yet inaccuracies related to the fact that oscillometric NIBP devices under-read high SBP relative to IBP measurements have been recognized as a potential source of maternal morbidity for years. The study will compare IBP readings obtained from morbidly obese, severely hypertensive (SBP \> 160 mm Hg) parturients with NIBP consecutively measured with new innovative conical Ultracheck Curve BP cuffs and large standard upper arm rectangular cylindrical BP cuffs.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 1, 2015
End Date
January 18, 2016
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
Female

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Laura Sorabella

Assistant Professor

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Written, signed and dated informed consent
  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • BMI \>40 kg/m2
  • Has a clinically indicated radial artery line already in situ or who agree to placement of an arterial line
  • Systolic blood pressure \>160 mm Hg
  • Gestational age greater than or equal to 24 weeks
  • Parturients admitted for induction of labor

Exclusion Criteria

  • Parturients admitted in labor

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Comparison of Noninvasive Systolic Blood Pressure Readings to Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement

Time Frame: Single time point measurement (1 day)

Absolute difference between the mean of 2 non-invasive systolic blood pressure readings and mean of 2 invasive systolic blood pressure readings

Secondary Outcomes

  • Comparison of Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) Measured Withnon-invasive Cuffs to MAP Measured by Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring(Single time point measurement (1 day))
  • Comparison of Noninvasive Diastolic Blood Pressure Readings to Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement(Single time point measurement (1 day))
  • Mean of 2 Systolic Blood Pressure Readings Taken With Cylindrical and Conical BP Cuffs(Single time point measurement (1 day))
  • Mean of 2 MAP Readings Taken With Cylindrical and Conical BP Cuffs(Single time point measurement (1 day))
  • Mean of 2 Diastolic Blood Pressure Non-invasive BP Measurements Taken With Cylindrical and Conical BP Cuffs(Single time point measurement (1 day))

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials