MedPath

Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Their Preferred Involvement in Decision Making

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Adolescent Behavior
Registration Number
NCT07035418
Lead Sponsor
Stanford University
Brief Summary

The purpose of this mixed-methods study is to determine Adolescent and Young Adult (AYAs) decision making preferences post cancer diagnosis using vignettes designed to assess their preferred involvement in decisions about their cancer treatment and variables associated with these treatment decision-making (TDM) preferences.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age (15-29 years)
  • Cancer diagnosis and on therapy, end-of-life or survivors (within 1 year)
  • Speaks English
  • Reads English
  • Cognitively and physically able to participate
Exclusion Criteria
  • Unable to participate in study due to developmental delay or developmental disorder

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Distribution of Decision-Making Roles in Clinical ScenariosWithin 2 weeks of survey link delivery

Proportion of participants who select an active, collaborative, or passive role in hypothetical clinical decision-making scenarios. Each role will be counted and compared across participant subgroups.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Association Between Sociodemographic Characteristics and Decision-Making RoleAt time of electronic survey completion

This outcome assesses the association between sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, gender, education level, and employment status) and adolescents' and young adults' preferred treatment decision-making role. Role preference (active, collaborative, or passive) is assessed using the modified Control Preferences Scale. Sociodemographic variables are self-reported via electronic questionnaire. The unit of measure is the chi-square test statistic or ANOVA output, depending on the variable type.

Concordance Between Interview Responses and Scenario-Based Decision-Making RolesAt time of interview, within 4 weeks of survey completion

Proportion of interview responses that align with or differ from role preferences identified in hypothetical scenarios. Qualitative responses will be coded and categorized into roles for comparison.

Correlation Between Healthcare Encounters and Decision-Making Role PreferenceAt time of interview, within 4 weeks of survey completion

This outcome measures the correlation between the number of cancer-related healthcare encounters and adolescents' and young adults' preferred treatment decision-making role. Healthcare encounters will be abstracted from the electronic health record and include clinic visits, procedures, hospitalizations, ICU stays, and emergency department visits. Decision-making role preference (active, collaborative, or passive) will be assessed using the modified Control Preferences Scale. The unit of measure is the Pearson correlation coefficient.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Stanford University

🇺🇸

Palo Alto, California, United States

Stanford University
🇺🇸Palo Alto, California, United States
Swathi Alagandula
Contact
650-725-1976
drswathi@stanford.edu
Kimberly Pyke-Grimm
Principal Investigator
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath