MedPath

Single-centre Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy

Completed
Conditions
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Interventions
Procedure: pancreatoduodenectomy
Registration Number
NCT05110573
Lead Sponsor
General Hospital Groeninge
Brief Summary

Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is increasingly performed. However, technical challenges and a perceived higher risk of complications has hindered wide adoption of a minimally invasive approach.

This is a retrospective comparison of a prospectively kept database. The investigators compared surgical outcomes and survival after laparoscopic (LPD) versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD). In order to reduce the effect of bias and confounding, baseline characteristics of both groups were matched using propensity score matching.

Detailed Description

All pancreatoduodenectomies were retrieved from a prospectively kept database and retrospectively analysed. All procedures were performed in a single supra-regional Belgian centre.

The primary endpoint was the major complication rate, defined by a Clavien-Dindo morbidity classification grade IIIa or higher \[11\]. Secondary endpoints were 90-day mortality rate, length of hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirements and specific pancreatic complications (pancreatic fistula, haemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying). In addition, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analysed in the subgroups of cancer patients.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
172
Inclusion Criteria
  • diagnosis of lesion of pancreatic head or peri-ampullary organs
Exclusion Criteria
  • < 18 years old

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomypancreatoduodenectomyCohort of patients that underwent a Whipple-procedure through a laparoscopic approach.
Open pancreatoduodenectomypancreatoduodenectomyCohort of patients that underwent a Whipple-procedure through a traditional open approach.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Major complication rate90 days postoperative

Complications classified as morbidity classification 3a or greater (Clavien-Dindo)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Postoperative morbidity90 days

All complications classified as morbidity classification 3a or greater (Clavien-Dindo)

Perioperative outcomesUp to 30 days

Operative time (min), blood transfusion requirements, estimated blood loss (mL)

Pancreatectomy-specific complications90 days

Postoperative pancreatic fistula, Post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, as defined by the respective ISGPS classification

Short-term postoperative outcomesUp to 30 days

Hospital stay (days), drain in situ (days), ICU stay (days)

Overall survival and disease-free survivalUp to 20 years

The Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation of survival and compared between subgroups of cancer patients

Oncological outcomesUp to 20 years

Analysis of resection specimen following contemporary pathlogy guidelines and defined by TNM staging system of pancreatic cancer by AJCC/UICC.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

General Hospital Groeninge

🇧🇪

Kortrijk, Belgium

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath