Single-centre Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
- Interventions
- Procedure: pancreatoduodenectomy
- Registration Number
- NCT05110573
- Lead Sponsor
- General Hospital Groeninge
- Brief Summary
Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is increasingly performed. However, technical challenges and a perceived higher risk of complications has hindered wide adoption of a minimally invasive approach.
This is a retrospective comparison of a prospectively kept database. The investigators compared surgical outcomes and survival after laparoscopic (LPD) versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD). In order to reduce the effect of bias and confounding, baseline characteristics of both groups were matched using propensity score matching.
- Detailed Description
All pancreatoduodenectomies were retrieved from a prospectively kept database and retrospectively analysed. All procedures were performed in a single supra-regional Belgian centre.
The primary endpoint was the major complication rate, defined by a Clavien-Dindo morbidity classification grade IIIa or higher \[11\]. Secondary endpoints were 90-day mortality rate, length of hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirements and specific pancreatic complications (pancreatic fistula, haemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying). In addition, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analysed in the subgroups of cancer patients.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 172
- diagnosis of lesion of pancreatic head or peri-ampullary organs
- < 18 years old
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy pancreatoduodenectomy Cohort of patients that underwent a Whipple-procedure through a laparoscopic approach. Open pancreatoduodenectomy pancreatoduodenectomy Cohort of patients that underwent a Whipple-procedure through a traditional open approach.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Major complication rate 90 days postoperative Complications classified as morbidity classification 3a or greater (Clavien-Dindo)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Postoperative morbidity 90 days All complications classified as morbidity classification 3a or greater (Clavien-Dindo)
Perioperative outcomes Up to 30 days Operative time (min), blood transfusion requirements, estimated blood loss (mL)
Pancreatectomy-specific complications 90 days Postoperative pancreatic fistula, Post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, as defined by the respective ISGPS classification
Short-term postoperative outcomes Up to 30 days Hospital stay (days), drain in situ (days), ICU stay (days)
Overall survival and disease-free survival Up to 20 years The Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation of survival and compared between subgroups of cancer patients
Oncological outcomes Up to 20 years Analysis of resection specimen following contemporary pathlogy guidelines and defined by TNM staging system of pancreatic cancer by AJCC/UICC.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
General Hospital Groeninge
🇧🇪Kortrijk, Belgium