Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00781833
NCT00781833TerminatedNot Applicable

Case Study Testing the Use of Implanted Microstimulators for Decreasing Spasticity and Improving Motion Following Spinal Cord Injury

The Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research1 site in 1 country1 target enrollmentStarted: October 1, 2008Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Terminated
Enrollment
1
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Adverse Events

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The primary aims of this study are to determine the safety of the RFM System (Alfred Mann Foundation, Santa Clarita, CA) in a patient with incomplete SCI and the effect of the RFM system on lower limb strength and spasticity. The secondary aim is to analyze any improvement in the participant's mobility.

Detailed Description

Restoring mobility after spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most important goals of rehabilitation. Even for patients with partial lower limb motor function after SCI, many have limited mobility because of significant spasticity. Therapeutic electrical neuromuscular stimulation (TNS) has been used to improve muscle tone and strength and to enable walking and standing in patients with SCI. We propose to use the Radio Frequency Microstimulator (RFM) System, a new and novel implantable TNS system developed by the Alfred E. Mann Foundation, to improve muscle strength and reduce spasticity in a patient with incomplete SCI. The RFM System has several advantages over current TNS systems. The RFM implant devices are small enough (diameter 2.4 mm, length 16.7 mm) to be inserted using an incision approximately 5 mm long and have no lead wires passing through the skin since the microstimulator contains both the anode and cathode. Implanted RFM devices can be placed near multiple motor points and/or nerves and are controlled individually using radio frequency technology. Up to six (6) RFM devices will be inserted, two to three in each lower limb to provide stimulation to a patient's bilateral knee extensors (femoral nerve stimulation) and ankle dorsiflexors (peroneal nerve stimulation) to assess the effects on muscle strength, limb spasticity and patient mobility.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
55 Years to 55 Years (Adult)
Sex
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • an incomplete C6 ASIA C (Central Cord) spinal cord injury
  • lower motor function impaired and suffers from significant spasticity (Ashworth scale 4)
  • able to ambulate approximately 10-20 feet with a rolling walker and minimal assistance
  • has sufficient endurance to complete at least two 20-minute therapy sessions per day
  • cognitive abilities are intact

Exclusion Criteria

  • psychiatric diagnosis
  • medical contraindications
  • history of bleeding disorders
  • allergy to anesthesia
  • acute or progressive disease
  • active implantable device

Arms & Interventions

Treatment

Experimental

Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation

Intervention: Radio Frequency Microstimulator (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Adverse Events

Time Frame: Throughout

Lower Limb Strength

Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 weeks, 12, 24 months

Lower Limb Spasticity

Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 weeks, 12, 24 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Mobility(6, 12, 24 weeks, 12, 24 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials