All on Four Versus All on Three Implant Treatment Concepts
- Conditions
- Prosthesis Durability
- Interventions
- Device: implant supported fixed full arch prosthesis
- Registration Number
- NCT05912127
- Lead Sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Brief Summary
the evaluation of patient satisfaction of All on-4 versus All on-3 implant treatment concepts rehabilitation of atrophied mandibular ridge.
- Detailed Description
Patients will be classified into 2 groups according to the implant treatment concept they received:
* Group 1 (control group); included patients who received All on 4 implant-supported fixed restoration. The patients received 2 inclined implants anterior to the mental foramina and 2 vertical implants in the lateral incisor/canine areas.
* Group 2 (test group); included patients who received All on 3 implant-supported fixed restoration. The patients received 2 inclined implants anterior to the mental foramina and 1 vertical implant in the midline of the mandible.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
-
-
All patients already have implants inserted in their mandibular ridges According to the All on 4 or All on 3 concepts.
-
They were healthy, free from any systemic diseases relating to bone resorption such as uncontrolled diabetes or osteoporosis. This was achieved through medical history and clinical examination by the physician.
-
All patients have sufficient inter-arch space. 4. All patients are of angle class I maxillo-mandibular relationships. 5. All patients had maxillary conventional complete dentures.
-
- Any neuromuscular disorders 2. Uncooperative patients
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description • Group 2 (test group); implant supported fixed full arch prosthesis patients who received All on 3 implant-supported fixed restoration. The patients received 2 inclined implants anterior to the mental foramina and 1 vertical implant in the midline of the mandible. • Group 1 (control group) implant supported fixed full arch prosthesis patients who received All on 4 implant-supported fixed restoration. The patients received 2 inclined implants anterior to the mental foramina and 2 vertical implants in the lateral incisor/canine areas.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method crestal bone loss Two year bone loss was measured around the implants in mm
patient satisfaction one year Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a questionnaire based on visual analog scale (VAS)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Christine Ibrahim
🇪🇬Mansoura, Egypt