MedPath

All on Four Versus All on Three Implant Treatment Concepts

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Prosthesis Durability
Interventions
Device: implant supported fixed full arch prosthesis
Registration Number
NCT05912127
Lead Sponsor
Mansoura University
Brief Summary

the evaluation of patient satisfaction of All on-4 versus All on-3 implant treatment concepts rehabilitation of atrophied mandibular ridge.

Detailed Description

Patients will be classified into 2 groups according to the implant treatment concept they received:

* Group 1 (control group); included patients who received All on 4 implant-supported fixed restoration. The patients received 2 inclined implants anterior to the mental foramina and 2 vertical implants in the lateral incisor/canine areas.

* Group 2 (test group); included patients who received All on 3 implant-supported fixed restoration. The patients received 2 inclined implants anterior to the mental foramina and 1 vertical implant in the midline of the mandible.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
    1. All patients already have implants inserted in their mandibular ridges According to the All on 4 or All on 3 concepts.

    2. They were healthy, free from any systemic diseases relating to bone resorption such as uncontrolled diabetes or osteoporosis. This was achieved through medical history and clinical examination by the physician.

    3. All patients have sufficient inter-arch space. 4. All patients are of angle class I maxillo-mandibular relationships. 5. All patients had maxillary conventional complete dentures.

Exclusion Criteria
  1. Any neuromuscular disorders 2. Uncooperative patients

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
• Group 2 (test group);implant supported fixed full arch prosthesispatients who received All on 3 implant-supported fixed restoration. The patients received 2 inclined implants anterior to the mental foramina and 1 vertical implant in the midline of the mandible.
• Group 1 (control group)implant supported fixed full arch prosthesispatients who received All on 4 implant-supported fixed restoration. The patients received 2 inclined implants anterior to the mental foramina and 2 vertical implants in the lateral incisor/canine areas.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
crestal bone lossTwo year

bone loss was measured around the implants in mm

patient satisfactionone year

Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a questionnaire based on visual analog scale (VAS)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Christine Ibrahim

🇪🇬

Mansoura, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath