Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05851937
NCT05851937CompletedNot Applicable

Optimizing Language Outcomes for Young Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Written Language Intervention Using Functional Texts

Baylor University1 site in 1 country55 target enrollmentStarted: May 1, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
55
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Use of Reading Comprehension Strategies

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of a written language intervention using functional texts for young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Detailed Description

Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) often present with limited literacy achievement which results in an absence of opportunities to foster written language development. However, when young adults with IDD are provided opportunities to broaden their literacy education even after high school, they continue to develop and improve their written and spoken language skills, which is associated with improved vocational and independent living options. To date, few studies have examined effective communication interventions for the often-underrepresented population of young adults with IDD. The objective of this study is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and initial effectiveness of a functional written language intervention embedded in naturally occurring daily activities (e.g., text messages, emails) for young adults with IDD. The central hypothesis is that (a) explicit written language intervention for functional texts (WLIFT) will result in greater use of reading comprehension strategies before, during, and after reading and (b) use of reading comprehension strategies will be associated with improvements in written and spoken language outcomes. The specific aims include (1) examining the effects of WLIFT intervention on use of reading comprehension strategies in functional texts by young adults with IDD, 2) examining the effects of the intervention on distal written language outcomes, and (3) examining the effects of the intervention on distal spoken language outcomes. The study target enrollment includes 40 young adults with IDD who will be randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group. Individuals in both groups will be assessed: (a) at the start of the study, (b) at the conclusion of intervention, and (c) six months following the conclusion of intervention. Individuals with IDD in the WLIFT group will receive 3-months of intervention that: (a) utilizes functional texts-activities of daily living that involve written language (e.g., text messages), (b) is specifically designed based on the phenotype of commonly occurring IDDs and is delivered at a critical time as young adults transition to independence, (c) involves teaching and assessing comprehension strategies implemented before, during, and after reading that have been previously shown to be associated with stronger written and spoken language skills in struggling readers, and (d) is implemented via telepractice to promote service delivery in meaningful contexts for the individual with IDD. This research is significant because it is expected to apply, adapt, and evaluate written language strategies found to be effective in other populations of struggling readers, thereby advancing the field of language development in individuals with IDD, where there is a striking paucity of communication intervention research.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 26 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • intellectual and/or developmental disability
  • correctly read at least 80% of words on word reading screener
  • have functional literacy needs
  • English as primary spoken language and use oral communication as their primary form of communication
  • normal or corrected to normal vision

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Written language intervention

Experimental

Participants will receive 3 months of weekly written language intervention sessions via telepractice.

Participants will be assessed at three time points to monitor outcomes.

Intervention: Written language intervention (Behavioral)

Periodic language check-up

No Intervention

Participants will be assessed at three time points to monitor outcomes.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Use of Reading Comprehension Strategies

Time Frame: 3 months after start of intervention

Total number of different reading comprehension strategies used correctly. A blank version of the FRAME intervention graphic organizer including only the picture icons of the reading comprehension strategies was displayed alongside a functional text stimulus (e.g., text messages, e-mails) that was designed to closely reflect participants' daily written communications. the examiner prompted the participant to begin reading the functional text. Each think-aloud was scored for the participants' accurate use of reading comprehension strategies. A percent accuracy score was calculated based on (a) the total number of strategies implemented correctly (out of nine; excluding Strategy 4 \[read text aloud\] because all participants were expected to read the text) and (b) implementing the strategies at the appropriate time (before, during, after reading) to earn up to three additional points (max score = 12). Higher scores reflect better performance.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Reading Comprehension of Functional Texts(3 months after start of intervention)
  • Use of Spoken Language to Indicate Comprehension(3 months after start of intervention)
  • Spoken Language: Summarize(3 months after start of intervention)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials