Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04950491
NCT04950491CompletedNot Applicable

Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Comparing Static Computer-aided Implant Surgery (s-CAIS) and Conventional Implant Surgery (CIS) for Single-tooth Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Mahidol University1 site in 1 country40 target enrollmentStarted: July 9, 2019Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
40
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change of the analgesics taken per day for 7 days: the number of tablets per day

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare PROMs in patients receiving single tooth replacement in posterior sites by s-CAIS and CIS.

Detailed Description

Since current patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) evidence related to static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) compared with conventional implant surgery (CIS), particularly in partial edentulous patients, were still limited. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare PROMs in patients receiving single tooth replacement in posterior sites by s-CAIS and CIS.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
Double (Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
25 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Healthy or well-controlled systemic disease (ASA classification I,II)
  • •A partially edentulous ridge in the premolar-molar region with existing two-sided interproximal as well as antagonist contacts
  • •No sign of acute oral infection
  • •Periodontally healthy (or successfully treated)
  • •More than 2 mm of keratinized gingiva at the site of surgery
  • •Sufficient bony ridge for implant placement with or without simultaneous bone grafting

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Diabetes mellitus
  • •Smoking more than ten cigarettes per day
  • •Pregnancy
  • •Psychiatric disorder
  • •History of radiation therapy at head and neck area and chemotherapy
  • •Bony pathologies, namely osseous dysplasia, odontogenic cyst, tumor
  • •History of soft tissue grafting at the prospective implant site
  • •Inadequate bony ridge with the need of bone augmentation prior to implant placement

Arms & Interventions

Test group (s-CAIS)

Experimental

The test group workflow used a fully computer-guided implant surgical protocol.

Intervention: Modified Dental Anxiety Score (MDAS) questionnaire (Other)

Test group (s-CAIS)

Experimental

The test group workflow used a fully computer-guided implant surgical protocol.

Intervention: Pain questionnaire (Other)

Test group (s-CAIS)

Experimental

The test group workflow used a fully computer-guided implant surgical protocol.

Intervention: Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) questionnaire (Other)

Control group (CIS)

Other

The control group workflow used a conventional implant surgical protocol.

Intervention: Pain questionnaire (Other)

Control group (CIS)

Other

The control group workflow used a conventional implant surgical protocol.

Intervention: Modified Dental Anxiety Score (MDAS) questionnaire (Other)

Control group (CIS)

Other

The control group workflow used a conventional implant surgical protocol.

Intervention: Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) questionnaire (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change of the analgesics taken per day for 7 days: the number of tablets per day

Time Frame: Patients were instructed to answer every day for 7 days starting from the day of surgery 1 hour before bedtime.

Patients were asked to describe the number of analgesics taken per day.

Change of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) for 7 days: 5-category Likert scale

Time Frame: Patients were instructed to answer the OHRQoL every day for 7 days starting from the day of surgery 1 hour before bedtime.

The OHRQoL questionnaire comprises 14 questions covering problems the patient may in three main categories: oral function, daily activity, and post-operative symptoms derived from Chaushu's study (Chaushu, Becker, Zeltser, Vasker, \& Chaushu, 2004). Patients answered this questionnaire using a 5-category Likert scale (Not at all, Very little, A little, Quite a lot, Very much).

Change of post-operative pain for 7 days: Visual Analog Scale

Time Frame: Patients were instructed to answer every day for 7 days starting from the day of surgery 1 hour before bedtime.

Patients were asked to describe the worst post-operative pain feeling using a standard 10 cm Visual Analog Scale.

Change of the proportion of time spent in severe pain for 7 days: 5-category Likert scale

Time Frame: Patients were instructed to answer every day for 7 days starting from the day of surgery 1 hour before bedtime.

Patients were asked to describe the proportion of time spent in severe pain using 5-category Likert scale (None, Low, Moderate, High, Very high).

Secondary Outcomes

  • The Modified Dental Anxiety Score (MDAS)(1 day (Patients completed the modified MDAS once, while waiting for the surgery in the waiting room.))

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Akarin Santivitoonvong

Doctor of Dental Surgery

Mahidol University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials