Can a Digital Tooll Facilitate Shared Decision-making and Increase Self-efficacy in Vocational Rehabilitation?
- Conditions
- Musculoskeletal Pain
- Interventions
- Behavioral: MIRABehavioral: Control
- Registration Number
- NCT04695002
- Lead Sponsor
- Region MidtJylland Denmark
- Brief Summary
The study investigates both the effects and the experienced value of the mobile application, MIRA, which is a combination of an electronic diary, a dialogue tool and a decision support tool. The individual user registers real-time data reported in a mobile application, e.g. pain, sleep, mood, social activities, work-related activities, based on the goals and condition of the individual user. In this study, users are citizens participating in vocational rehabilitation due to long term sick leave.
The purpose of MIRA is to support a positive and trustful relationship between the citizen and the professional, and to enhance user involvement and shared decision making in the course of rehabilitation. This happens through promotion of the citizens knowledge and understanding of their own health condition and increase his or her self-efficacy, i.e. their ability to cope with their health condition at work and in everyday life.
The study uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, analysed both individually and in combination, where findings of the different methods are combined to provide a deeper understanding of the positive and negative effects of using MIRA in vocational rehabilitation.
In this way the study investigates both the effect of applying a digital tool, such as MIRA, on a number of quantifiable measures (using questionnaires), and at the same time the study explores what works for whom and why using qualitative and combined methods. In this way, the study aims to contribute with knowledge in a balanced manner, regarding the pros and cons of using digital tools with real-time self-reported data in rehabilitation.
The study aim will be fulfilled through the following sub-purposes:
1. To investigate the effect of using MIRA in a course of vocational rehabilitation in relation to the citizens' self-efficacy for pain and work and their experience of shared decision-making in the course of rehabilitation.
2. To investigate the citizens' experience with and perception of using a digital tool like MIRA in their course of rehabilitation.
3. To investigate the professionals' experience with and perception of using a digital tool like MIRA in the course of rehabilitation.
4. To investigate the mechanisms of effect of MIRA (i.e. what works for whom and why), through and integrated analysis of the findings of sub-purpose 1-3.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Referred for a course of vocational rehabilitation at a multidisciplinary health care unit at a municipal employment department.
- On sick leave or unemployed due to musculoskeletal or stress-related disorders
- In the working age (18 - 68 years approximately)
- On sick leave or unemployed for other reasons, e.g. psychiatric disorders or cancer;
- Under the age of 18 or older than 68 years (approximately)
- Not sufficiently familiar with Danish language to use the MIRA app as intended.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description MIRA group MIRA Citizens in the MIRA group will participate in the existing course of vocational rehabilitation offered in the municipal department. In addition they will be introduced to MIRA at the beginning of the rehabilitation course, and use MIRA throughout the course of rehabilitation. Control group Control Citizens in the control group participate in the existing course of vocational rehabilitation offered in the municipal employment department, without the use of MIRA app.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Return-to-work Self-efficacy Scale (RTW-SE) At baseline and at end of rehabilitation, an average of 8 weeks The RTW-SE is a 10-item questionnaire measuring the respondent's self-efficacy for coping with their health condition in relation to returning to work. Score ranges from 10-50 points, with 50 points reflecting the highest level of self-efficacy
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method WHO-5 At baseline and at end of rehabilitation, an average of 8 weeks WHO5-index is a 5-item generic questionnaire for measuring self-reported quality of life and general well-being. Each item is scored on a scale of 5 (best) to 0 (worst), adding up to a total score of 0-25
CollaboRATE At end of rehabilitation, an average of 8 weeks CollaboRATE is a 3-item questionnaire, measuring to what extent the respondent feels involved in the decision making process in their course of rehabilitation (i.e. shared decision making) on a scale of 0-9 (worst-best). An average score of the three items is calculated
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Sociallægeinstitutionen
🇩🇰Aarhus, Denmark