Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency of Pediatric Single Rotary File Systems for Pulpectomy in Primary Molars – An In Vivo Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2/3 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 90
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To evaluate the clinical efficiency of
研究概览
简要总结
For themorphologically challenging primary root canals, pulpectomy serves as goldstandard therapeutic treatment. Manual hand files has various limitationssuch as time consuming and occurrence of iatrogenic errors. Rotary filesexclusively for primary tooth were introduced in India through KEDO Rotary files. Though the dual rotary file systems arehighly successful, the recently introduced single rotary file systems posses abetter features and quality than the former. Among the single rotary files, two different generations are introduced whose clinical efficiency has never been evaluated and we aim to find the better file among the Two generations of single rotary files
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Permuted block randomization, fixed
- 盲法
- Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 4.00 Year(s) 至 8.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •a)Normal, Healthy Children between 4 to 8 years b)Frankl’s Behaviour Rating 3 (positive), 4 (definitely positive) c)Primary molars with irreversible pulpitis d)Primary molars with no signs of pathological resorption e)IOPA Radiograph examination revealing primary molars with two thirds of each root remaining.
排除标准
- •a)Primary molars with unrestorable crown structures.
- •b)Primary molars with perforated pulpal floor and sinus tract.
- •c)Primary molars with intraoral & extraoral swelling.
- •d)Primary molars with Grade III, IV mobility.
- •e)Children with special healthcare needs.
结局指标
主要结局
To evaluate the clinical efficiency of
时间窗: At Baseline
pediatric single rotary file systems by
时间窗: At Baseline
assessing:
时间窗: At Baseline
Obturation quality
时间窗: At Baseline
Instrumentation time
时间窗: At Baseline
Obturation time
时间窗: At Baseline
次要结局
- To compare patient discomfort levels in(children during the pulpectomy)