Cost Effectiveness and Effectiveness of the Addition of Different Weekly Frequency of Modified Pilates Method Exercises to a Minimal Intervention in the Treatment of Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Sponsor
- Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo
- Enrollment
- 296
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Pain intensity
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 8 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Low back pain is a major cause of disability and absenteeism and the supervised exercise is a recommended treatment by the guidelines and has been cost-effective. Currently, the Pilates method has shown to be effective in improving pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, there is still no evidence about the ideal number of sessions for the treatment and the interval between sessions to achieve better efficacy of this method for these patients. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the Pilates method with different weekly frequency of sessions in the treatment of patients with nonspecific CLBP. Investigators will assess 296 patients of both genders, with nonspecific CLBP lasting more than three months and aged between 18 and 80 years. Participants will be randomly divided into four groups (n = 74 patients per group): Control Group will receive an educational booklet and no additional exercise, Pilates 1 Group will receive a program of exercises based on Pilates method once a week for six weeks, Pilates 2 Group will receive the same program of exercises twice a week for six weeks and Pilates 3 Group will receive the same program of exercises three times a week for six weeks. The outcomes overall disability (Roland Morris Disability questionnaire), specific disability (Patient-Specific Functional scale), kinesiophobia (Tampa scale for kinesiophobia), pain intensity (Pain Numerical Rating scale) and global perceived effect (Global Perceived Effect scale) will be assessed by a blinded assessor before, six weeks, six and 12 months after randomization. Investigators expect that the largest number of weekly sessions of Pilates method may influence the results in all analyzes (short, medium and long term), since there is a relationship between frequency of exercises and effect size of the treatment.
Investigators
Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral
Associate Professor
Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain longer 12 weeks
Exclusion Criteria
- •Contra indications to physical exercise
- •Serious spinal pathologies (e. g. tumors, fractures and inflammatory diseases)
- •Nerve root compromise
- •Pregnancy
- •Previous surgery on spine
- •Pilates treatment for low back pain in the last three months
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Six weeks after randomization
Pain intensity will be measured by an 11-point Pain Numerical Rating Scale
Disability
Time Frame: Six weeks after randomization
Disability associated with low back pain will be measured by the 24-item Roland Morris Disability Questionaire
Secondary Outcomes
- Disability(Six and twelve months after randomization)
- Global impression of recovery(Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomization)
- Cost Effectiveness(Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomization)
- Quality Adjusted Life Years(Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomization)
- Pain intensity(Six and twelve months after randomization)
- Specific disability(Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomizaion)
- Kinesiophobia(Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomization)
- Pain-Related Catastrophizing(Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomization)