The Effect of Probiotics on the Incidence of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Patients With Cirrhosis and Ascites
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 终止
- 入组人数
- 10
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Liver-related mortality and liver related morbidity
研究概览
简要总结
Research question: Do oral probiotics in patients with cirrhosis and ascites reduce intestinal bacterial concentrations, ascitic bacterial DNA, SBP and bacteraemia compared to antibiotics or placebo?
This study is designed to investigate the effects of an oral probiotic (VSL#3; a mixture of "healthy" bacteria for the intestines) compared to an antibiotic or placebo in preventing infection developing in the abdominal fluid ("ascites") that collects in patients with advanced liver disease ("cirrhosis"). Patients already having had infection will be excluded from the study. Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria will be met and patients will be monitored throughout the study to examine whether they have required more hospitalisations, their rate infection in abdominal fluid or elsewhere and the level of liver function.
详细描述
The prevalence of cirrhosis is increasing in the UK. Decompensation heralds a poor outcome, with mortality in those developing ascites approximately 50% over the following 1-2 years. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in ascitic fluid further reduces survival and occurs due to a combination of increased intestinal epithelial dysfunction, bacterial translocation to mesenteric lymph nodes and ascitic fluid, and reduced opsonisation and neutrophil function. Even with antibiotic treatment, 3-month mortality from SBP is approximately 40% and results in expensive in-patient care. Several studies have confirmed the benefit of secondary prophylaxis with long-term oral antibiotics in patients with advanced liver disease (e.g. norfloxacin, co-trimoxazole) and others suggest that in patients at high risk of developing SBP, primary antibiotic prophylaxis improves rates of sepsis and survival. Problems with these strategies include emergence of bacterial resistance, and development of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (including C. difficile infection, which has a high case-fatality rate in those with cirrhosis). Local bacterial resistance profiles and association with C. difficile infection favour the choice of co-trimoxazole in our study population. Patients with advanced cirrhosis taking co-trimoxazole have previously demonstrated reduced liver-related outcomes such as infection and death3. Probiotic preparations alter intestinal bacterial flora and improve intestinal barrier and neutrophil function. Faecal bacterial counts of E. coli and Streptococcus (organisms commonly responsible for SBP) showed a 2-log fall with probiotics, although whether they could reduce the incidence of SBP remains unexamined.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
研究组 & 干预措施
Co-trimoxazole
Co-trimoxazole 960mg daily po
干预措施: cotrimoxazole (Drug)
VSL#3 active
VSL#3 active 2 sachets/daily
干预措施: VSL#3 active (Drug)
VSL#3 placebo
VSL#3 placebo 2 sachets/daily
干预措施: VSL#3 placebo (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
Liver-related mortality and liver related morbidity
时间窗: 12 months
次要结局
- Incidence of SBP, variceal bleeding, any non-SBP sepsis (e.g. pneumonia, urinary tract infection), clinical episodes of encephalopathy and the incidence of C. difficile infection.(12 months)
