MedPath

A Novel Method of Lung Isolation Compared With Standard Methods in a Model of Massive Pulmonary Hemorrhage

Not Applicable
Conditions
Pulmonary Hemorrhage
Interventions
Device: Bronchial Blocker
Registration Number
NCT05001607
Lead Sponsor
University of British Columbia
Brief Summary

Dr. Purdy has developed a novel bronchial blocker device that has multiple applications. In this project, a simulation model of massive pulmonary hemorrhage in an adolescent intubating manikin will be used to compare the novel method against 3 published methods of lung isolation.

Detailed Description

Purpose: To compare a novel airway device in a realistic adolescent airway model of massive pulmonary hemorrhage to three standard methods of lung isolation.

Hypothesis: The novel method will be as fast or faster than traditional methods.

Justification: Lung isolation in massive pulmonary hemorrhage is associated with mortality rates as high as 40%. Current methods of lung isolation are challenging and have a number of limitations. The development of this novel device was a response to the limitations of current solutions and could significantly increase the speed and ease of placing a bronchial blocker under these circumstances.

Objectives: (1) To determine the length of time required for successful lung isolation in each of the four methods trialed. (2) To determine the length of time required for intubation in each of the four methods trialed. (3) To describe challenges in each method within the scenario of massive pulmonary hemorrhage. (4) To assess the utility of the model of massive pulmonary hemorrhage in future simulations.

Research Design: We propose a within-subject randomized procedure evaluation study comparing the placement of a novel bronchial blocker with three standard methods of lung isolation in a massive pulmonary hemorrhage simulation.

Analysis: Mixed effects model will be used to test the difference in total time to lung isolation between the novel method and the other three methods, with the subject as the random variable. If normality and homogeneity assumptions of the mixed-effects model are not fulfilled, then the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test would be used to compare the novel method to each of the other methods. Time constraints are placed on completion of a task, as such, we will complete sensitivity analysis where we include all participants in the analysis compared to excluding those that were unable to complete at least 1 method.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • Practicing anesthesiologists
  • Anesthesia fellows
Exclusion Criteria
  • Those who don't want to participate

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Study trialBronchial BlockerAll participants will perform pulmonary blockade on an intubating manikin using 4 different methods: Endobronchial intubation with an endotracheal tube; Bronchial blocker attached to the outside of an endotracheal tube; Double lumen endotracheal tube; and Intraluminal placement of bronchial blocker.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total time to successful lung isolation.Within 10 minutes from start of direct laryngoscopy

Total time from start of direct laryngoscopy to establishment of lung isolation confirmed by one lung ventilation.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to successful method placementWithin 10 minutes from successful intubation

Time from successful intubation to establishment of lung isolation.

Model utilityAt the end of the trial, within an hour of starting the first practice intubation.

Responses on post-study questionnaire for future utility of the model in simulations, based on the Lung Isolation Techniques Simulation Training Evaluation Questionnaire (LITSTEQ) developed by Failor and colleagues (2014) https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2013.07.015, modified to specify training for massive pulmonary hemorrhage.

Graded on a Likert scale of 1-5; 1 - Strongly disagree, 2 - Disagree, 3 - Neutral, 4 - Agree, 5 - Strongly Agree. Higher scores relate to a more positive outcome in assessing the utility of using the simulation model for massive pulmonary hemorrhage training.

Time to successful intubationWithin 10 minutes from start of direct laryngoscopy

Time from the start of direct laryngoscopy to successful intubation confirmed by ventilation of both lungs.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

BC Children's Hospital - Department of Anesthesia

🇨🇦

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath