Posturography-assisted Vestibular Retraining for Stable Unilateral Vestibular Deficit
- Conditions
- Inner Ear InjuryDizzinessEquilibrium; Disorder, LabyrinthInner Ear Disease
- Registration Number
- NCT05115032
- Lead Sponsor
- Eytan A. David
- Brief Summary
People that have difficulty with balance have a higher risk of falling and reduced quality of life. Some individuals can learn to compensate using their vision, their sense of where their limbs are in space, and balance organs that are still intact. Rehabilitation exercises, which typically involve shaking and nodding of the head, are often prescribed for dizzy patients but are not effective for everyone. Our study aims to determine if specific exercises performed on footplate sensors with visual feedback is superior to traditional rehabilitation exercises done at home for improving balance and quality of life.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 37
-
Dizziness handicap inventory score at time of enrolment over 30
-
Unilateral vestibular weakness confirmed one or more of:
- Videonystagmography showing unilateral weakness to bithermal testing of greater than 25%
- VEMP: IAD asymmetry of greater than 40% for both cVEMP and oVEMP
- VEMP: absence of both ocular and cervical vemp responses in one ear in the context of normal and replicable other ear
- Or unilateral vestibular weakness idiopathic, not yet diagnosed (NYD)
-
Persistent imbalance following diagnosis of resolved benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV)
-
Symptomatic
-
Long-standing/persistent symptoms greater than six months
- Orthopedic deficit (eg. lower body joint dysfunction or lower joint replacement)
- Neurological deficit or proprioception deficit
- Diabetes
- Poor vision or blindness
- Fluctuating vestibular symptoms, or condition known to fluctuate eg. Menière's disease, perilymphatic fistula (PLF) or superior canal dehiscence (SDCS)
- Active benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV)
- Undergoing treatment which may affect balance or ability to stand
- Cognitive impairment that prevents understanding and responding to instructions required to complete the study
- Inability to provide informed consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method SOT composite score Through study completion, 12 rehabilitation sessions, an average of 7 weeks Change in composite score of sensory organization test (Scores from 0-100; higher scores indicate better function)
Dizziness Handicap Inventory Through study completion, 12 rehabilitation sessions, an average of 7 weeks Change in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI); 16-30 Points (mild handicap), 32-52 Points (moderate handicap), 54+ Points (severe handicap)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method LOS excursion Through study completion, 12 rehabilitation sessions, an average of 7 weeks Limits of Stability test mean endpoint excursion value and maximum excursion point; (Scores from 0-100; higher scores indicate better function)
DHI component scores Through study completion, 12 rehabilitation sessions, an average of 7 weeks Emotional, physical, and functional components of the DHI score
FES-I score Through study completion, 12 rehabilitation sessions, an average of 7 weeks Change in Fall Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I); possible scores 16-64, higher score indicates greater impairment
SOT condition scores Through study completion, 12 rehabilitation sessions, an average of 7 weeks Change in mean SOT scores for conditions 1 through 6; (Scores from 0-100; higher scores indicate better function)
SOT vestibular contribution Through study completion, 12 rehabilitation sessions, an average of 7 weeks Change in mean value of SOT condition 5/mean value of SOT conditions 1; measured as a ratio, higher scores indicate a greater vestibular contribution to balance deficit
ABC Score Through study completion, 12 rehabilitation sessions, an average of 7 weeks Change in Activity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) score; (Scores from 0-100; higher scores indicate better function)
LOS directional control Through study completion, 12 rehabilitation sessions, an average of 7 weeks Limits of Stability test mean value of directional control of limits of stability; (Scores from 0-100; higher scores indicate better function)
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Dr. EA David MD FRCSC
🇨🇦North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Dr. EA David MD FRCSC🇨🇦North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
