Clinical Efficacy in Relief of Dyspnea by HVNI: Evaluation of New Device Equivalence
- Conditions
- HypercapniaRespiratory InsufficiencyDyspnea
- Interventions
- Device: Conventional Precision FlowDevice: HVNI HVT2.0 Device
- Registration Number
- NCT04590014
- Lead Sponsor
- Vapotherm, Inc.
- Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the ability of a new High Velocity Nasal Insufflation \[HVNI\] device design to effect ventilation and related physiological responses relative to the current HVNI device design.
- Detailed Description
The objective of this study is to evaluate the ability of a new HVNI device to improve ventilation, dyspnea, and related physiological responses relative to the conventional Precision Flow device design, with which there are published clinical outcomes data. It is hypothesized that the new HVNI device design (V2.0) will be comparable at relieving patient dyspnea when compared to the conventional HVNI device design (Precision Flow).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 5
- Adult inpatients (18 years of age and older)
- Demonstrated severe dyspnea at baseline (Borg Rated Perceived Dyspnea [RPD] (scale 0-10) of 3 or higher)
- Severe baseline hypercarbia/hypercapnia of 55 mmHg or higher as measured by TcPCo2 or arterial or venous blood gas
- Patient has unstable cardiovascular condition
- Significant unilateral or bilateral nasal occlusion
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Pregnancy
- Known contraindication to perform steps of the protocol
- Absence of spontaneous respiration or known contraindication to HVNI
- Inability to use HVNI therapy
- Agitation or uncooperativeness
- Determined by the clinician to be sufficiently unstable or unsuitable for this study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Conventional HVNI First, Then New HVNI Second (Randomized) Conventional Precision Flow The purpose of this intervention is to evaluate the efficacy of the conventional HVNI device design (Precision Flow) to provide targeted relief of dyspnea. The purpose of this intervention is to evaluate the efficacy of a new HVNI device design (V2.0) to provide targeted relief of dyspnea. Conventional HVNI First, Then New HVNI Second (Randomized) HVNI HVT2.0 Device The purpose of this intervention is to evaluate the efficacy of the conventional HVNI device design (Precision Flow) to provide targeted relief of dyspnea. The purpose of this intervention is to evaluate the efficacy of a new HVNI device design (V2.0) to provide targeted relief of dyspnea. New HVNI First, Then Conventional HVNI Second (Randomized) HVNI HVT2.0 Device The purpose of this intervention is to evaluate the efficacy of the conventional HVNI device design (Precision Flow) to provide targeted relief of dyspnea. The purpose of this intervention is to evaluate the efficacy of a new HVNI device design (V2.0) to provide targeted relief of dyspnea. New HVNI First, Then Conventional HVNI Second (Randomized) Conventional Precision Flow The purpose of this intervention is to evaluate the efficacy of the conventional HVNI device design (Precision Flow) to provide targeted relief of dyspnea. The purpose of this intervention is to evaluate the efficacy of a new HVNI device design (V2.0) to provide targeted relief of dyspnea.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient Vital Signs -- Rated Perceived Dyspnea (RPD) Through study completion, an average of 1.6 hours Patient's subjective assessment of their dyspnea, rated as a modified Borg score on a scale from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient Vital Signs - Heart Rate [HR] Through study completion, an average of 1.6 hours Heart rate, measured in beats per minute (bpm)
Patient Vital Signs - Respiratory Rate [RR] Through study completion, an average of 1.6 hours Respiratory rate, measured in breaths per minute (brpm)
Patient Vital Signs - Transcutaneous CO2 [TcPCO2] Through study completion, an average of 1.6 hours TcPCO2, measured as percentage of CO2 (%)
Patient Vital Signs - Arterial Oxygen Saturation [SpO2] Through study completion, an average of 1.6 hours SpO2 measured as percentage of oxygen saturation (%)
Patient Vital Signs - Blood Pressure [BP] Through study completion, an average of 1.6 hours Blood pressure (systolic) measured in mmHg
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System
🇺🇸Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States