Treating Common Mental Disorders in Women in Mozambique by Addressing Intimate Partner Violence in Couples
- Conditions
- DepressionAnxietyPTSDIntimate Partner Violence
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Interpersonal Psychotherapy (Individual)Behavioral: Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Couples
- Registration Number
- NCT06252909
- Lead Sponsor
- New York State Psychiatric Institute
- Brief Summary
Adapting mental health treatments to address modifiable interpersonal problems has the potential to improve and sustain outcomes in low-resource settings where treatment gaps persist. This K23 Award will prepare the candidate to become an independent investigator with high-impact public health research and expertise in couple-based interventions that address interrelated mental health problems and intimate partner violence in couples by gaining expertise in engagement and treatment of men, adapting an evidence-based treatment for common mental disorders to address IPV in couples, designing and conducting randomized controlled trials with couples, and professional skills development. This work has applicability for low-resource low-income countries and US populations that experience couple-based violence and the mental health treatment gap. With its focus on intimate partners, the intervention also has the potential to benefit health and wellbeing of children.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 108
- Both partners aged ≥18;
- both partners identify each other as one of (in case of polygamous marriage) their primary sexual partners of the opposite sex;
- partnered for at least 3 months;
- woman screens positive for a CMD using the Mental Wellness Tool developed and validated by our PRIDE team in Mozambique;
- couples have mild to moderate forms of situational IPV (Ongoing Abuse Scale score = 1 or above). See below exclusion criteria for how severity will be determined.;
- both partners desire to maintain the relationship;
- woman identifies marital dispute as the main interpersonal problem area causing CMD symptoms.
- Any indicators of severe IPV. The determination of severity will be assessed using items (presence or absence) on the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS). If any couple member answers yes to both of the following items: "I punched or hit my partner with something that could hurt" and "I kicked my partner," couples will be excluded. Couple members who answer yes to any of the following items: "I used a knife or gun on my partner," "I choked my partner," "I slammed my partner against a wall," "I beat up my partner," "I burned or scalded my partner on purpose," will be excluded. Finally, if any couple member reports that a violent behavior was repeated at least six times in a year by their partner or themselves, violence will be considered severe.;
- (2) discrepancy (>2) in reporting of frequency of violence on CTS in overall average scores of the partners or for any single behavior in the scale. For example, if the female partner reports that her male partner slapped her three times, but the male partner reports that he never slapped his female partner, the couple will be excluded for discrepant reporting for the act of slapping.;
- history of violent legal offences;
- male partner has severe CMD symptoms (PHQ-9 score of 20 or above; GAD-7 score of 15 or above; and PCL-C score of 45 or above); and either partner demonstrates/reports
- serious mental illness,
- cognitive impairment,
- history of mania (Psychosis Screening Questionnaire score = 1),
- hazardous alcohol use (AUDIT score of 8 or above),
- current suicidality,
- not speaking Portuguese,
- feeling unsafe to participate,
- inability to complete the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Interpersonal Psychotherapy (Individual) Interpersonal Psychotherapy (Individual) - Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Couples Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Couples -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mental Wellness Tool measured at pre-treatment and weeks 8, 12, 20, 32 The Mental Wellness Tool was developed and validated by the PRIDE team in Mozambique to screen for and differentiate cases according to presence or absence of common mental disorders, severe mental illness, substance use disorders, and suicidal risk. Patients are asked three initial questions. If they respond positively to any of the 3 items, they are asked 10 additional items. The Mental Wellness Tool will be used to screen patients for common mental disorders and exclude patients with severe mental illness, substance use disorders, or suicidality. It will additionally be used to track metrics to determine Reach (i.e., number in need).
IPT Fidelity Checklist measured up to 8 weeks The IPT Fidelity Checklist measures provider fidelity to Interpersonal Therapy. Providers are assessed for low (1), moderate (2), or high (3) adherence to each treatment element. A total score is calculated y summing individuals items. The PRIDE team has adapted this Checklist for Interpersonal Counseling, which will be further adapted in the proposed study for couple-based treatment.
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire Client Satisfaction Questionnaire - 8 (CSQ-8) measured at week 8 The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire - 8 measures respondents' opinions about services they have received. Responses are based on a four-point scale (ranging from very negative to very positive), but the options differ depending on the item. Scores range from 8 to 32; higher values indicate higher satisfaction. Scores are calculated by summing scores across all items.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method PTSD Checklist - Civilian Version (PCL-C) measured at pre-treatment and weeks 8, 12, 20, 32 The PCL-C is a standardized self-report scale for PTSD comprised of 17 items. It uses a 5-point scale where respondents indicate how much they have been bothered by a symptom (1 = Not at All
- 5 = Extremely). Items are totaled for a severity score (range = 17-85; 17-29 = little to no severity; 30-44 = moderate to moderately high severity; 45-85 = high severity).Dyadic Adjustment Scale measured at pre-treatment and weeks 8, 12, 20, 32 The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (32 Likert items) measures relationship functioning and satisfaction. The four subscales include: Dyadic Satisfaction, Dyadic Consensus, Dyadic Cohesion, and Dyadic Affectional Expression. The score range is 1-151. A higher score indicates better adjustment to marriage.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7) measured at pre-treatment and weeks 8, 12, 20, 32 GAD-7 is a screening instrument with seven items to assess presence and severity of generalized anxiety severity. Scores range from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) for a total range of 0 to 21. Score cut off points are 5 (mild), 10 (moderate), 15 (severe) anxiety.
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9) measured at pre-treatment and weeks 8, 12, 20, 32 The PHQ-9 is an instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring, and measuring severity of depression. Score cut offs for depression are 5 (mild), 10 (moderate), 15 (moderately severe) and 20 (severe).
Revised Conflict Tactics Scale measured at pre-treatment and weeks 8, 12, 20, 32 The Revised Conflict Tactics Scale measures physical, psychological, and sexual intimate partner violence. It consists of 39 items are asked twice: once for respondent and once for partner. Item responses gauge frequency and range from "Never" to "20 or more times." It has five subscales: Negotiation, Psychological Aggression, Physical Assault, Injury, and Sexual Coercion.
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) measured at pre-treatment and weeks 8, 12, 20, 32 The AUDIT is comprised of 10 items that screen for hazardous or dependent drinking levels. Questions range from 0 to 4 with the exception of items 9 and 10 which have three response options and are scored 0, 2, 4. Items are summed. Score cut off points are 8 (hazardous drinking) and 13 women/15 men (alcohol dependence).